QUESTION -
What did the first clvilizations In Asla and Africa have In common?What did the first civilizations in Asia and Africa have in common?
A. They emerged along sea coasts
B.They had organized governments
C.They lacked social hierarchies
D. They practiced monotheism
ANSWER -
The answer is A. they emerge along the sea cost
The Statue of Liberty was given to the US by France as a gift. It was designed by Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi<span> and built by </span><span>Gustave Eiffel. It is a woman representing Libertas a Roman goodness. It is a symbol of freedom and also a welcoming sight for the immigrates who come to the US.</span><span />
Zealots were a political/philosophic movement in first century (what I call) Israel. They were (if I can put it this way) a sort of uncouth bunch who thought the only way to free themselves from Roman rule was to oppose the Romans with force.
That was their platform. They did not take into account that the Roman's were a huge military power that was ruthless when antagonized. As these things go, Rome was a pretty good ruler. At least they knew the difference between meaningful opposition and tolerance of differences.
The zealots did not see Rome that way. They believed that any interference was too much interference.
That's when Rome got upset and the first Jewish War of 65 AD or so began. It was like sticking your arm in a hornet's nest. The Zealots had gained the largely unwelcome wrath of Rome. The zealots were unlucky (in a way). If they had picked a time that a warrior/emperor was not leader, their opposition may have evaporated. It would be like hitting a marshmallow. Rome may have considered it an internal affair. They had up to this point. Even though some of the Pharisee priests supported the Zealots, the alliance was destroyed by the unwillingness to negotiate further.
Anyone who is really dedicated can be termed a Zealot in modern times. I am using the term to describe someone that is Zealous. You could look up Galatians 1:11 - 14 to see how Paul used the term. This connection between Paul and Jewish leaders (including Zealots) is really hotly debated. It's another hornet's nest.
Answer: THEY WERE FEARFUL OF DIVISIONS AND INSTABILITY WITHIN THE AMERICAN SOCIETY.
Explanation:
Other common characteristics are:
- They were older, better established, and resisted radical change.
- They felt that rebellion against the Crown; the legitimate government, was morally wrong.
- They were alienated when the Patriots resorted to violence, such as burning houses and tarring and feathering.
- They wanted to take a middle-of-the-road position and were angry when forced by the Patriots to declare their opposition.
- They had a long-standing sentimental attachment to Britain (often with business and family links).
- They realized that independence was bound to come someday, but wanted to postpone the moment.
- They were cautious and afraid that chaos and mob rule would result.
She's showing the freedom of speech in that quite
