Simple. First you would make an outline coming up with the reasons that support your subject. Then next you would fill them in a straight line down. So to start your intro write a hook to grab your readers attention. Then after write your supporting reasons after. Thats the intro. After your intro to write your first paragraph write your claim and counterclaim. Like if i was going to say dogs are better then cats i would write"Although dogs are popular pets so are cats but are preferred as they cost less due to survey done by geoplanet or some other company name." The write a another sentence like the first followed by a second just like i did above a topic as well as supporting factor. Then for your second paragraph use your second reason as well as a supporting detail following the same format as your first and then third if your teacher requires it. Then for a conclusion write something like In conclusion "dogs are better since they cost less, love to play, and are good for protection against burglars" to sum up your three reasons.
Even though you didn't give us any excerpts, I can still try to help you.
I would say the correct answer is that <span>Grendel is described as an unfeeling creature in Beowulf, but he is a sensitive and emotional character in Grendel.
Based on the system of elimination, that should be the correct answer. B is incorrect because he is scary and monstrous, not comical and ridiculous; C is incorrect because Beowulf acts bravely and honorably in Beowulf, not the other way round; D is incorrect because there is no sympathy towards Grendel in Beowulf because he is a ruthless monster. So this leaves us with A as the correct answer.
</span>
Answer:
Its really nice in my opinion and original.
Explanation:
It means, someone who adores plants and nature etc.
