Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Many constitutional monarchies started out as, would be: Absolute monarchies.
Explanation:
The big difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy, is the limitations placed on the power exercised by a monarch, or head ruler, of a country. In ancient times, this became the norm, especially in Europe, where the absolute power of kings was unquestioned and unchecked by anyone. However, even if kingdoms all over the world started out as absolute monarchies, with the King or Queen being the only law in the land, this changed through time, until these rulers became bound by another law; that of a constitution. This is the case of England, and other such nations, where government went from being solely in the hands of a ruler, to the ruler´s power being chained by constitutions. Today, many of the monarchies only have Kings and Queens as symbols, but they play no part in government.
Answer:
No, because freedom gives people the right for their voice of opinion to be heard.
Answer:
Brown vs Bourd of Education court case
This is a condition having tail in a crack.
Explanation:
In the given question, the scenario is that there is a legal restriction, called as entailment, with the Cunningham family, while selling a piece of their land for the purpose of gaining money or profit. According to the legal term, entailment, the owner of the land or house is unable to sell it for profit. The property can only be transferred to the other member of the family.
So now it is a logical example that having a tail in the crack. It means that when tail of an animal is stuck in a crack, that animal is unable to move. So this example best illustrates the situation of the Cunningham Family, as they are facing the entailment, and stuck with the land which they own and which they cannot sell for profit. They do not have any other choice than staying with the land, which means their tail is stuck in the crack.
Learn more about entailment at:
brainly.com/question/13568955
#LearnWithBrainly
Emperor Diocletian divided the Roman Empire into two sections to make it easier to control.
please rate thanks and make the this the brainiest