Answer:
parol evidence
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the admission of Brogan's testimony is most likely governed by the parol evidence rule. This rule created to prevent a party from introducing evidence before the agreement was made final in order to change the existing contract. Which is what Brogan is doing in this scenario by trying to release evidence about his age before the finalization of the contract.
The United States and the Soviet Union
The correct answer is individualism.
In the individualist society, everybody puts themselves and their own needs first, and then the others come second. Personal success is very important for such people, and the others aren't as relevant in their lives as in collectivist societies, for example.
Explanation:
non-representative it's not based off of Constitution I think?
Martin luther king was:
• strong
• magnificent
• intelligent
• respectful
• peaceful
• provided justice to society
