Answer:
When I entered university, I lived in a small town near Tokyo. That was the first time I lived alone. I felt it was a feather in my cap. I had nothing but a small bicycle. But I felt happy every day. I wasn’t afraid to lose my shirt because I always lived on a shoestring. I didn’t become hot under the collar because everyone helped me kindly.
I found a part-time job in supermarket. The owner was a bit of a stuffed shirt. So I tried to keep his shirt on and to handle our customers with kid gloves.
The experience taught me a sense of responsibility.
Explanation:
a group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words (e.g., rain cats and dogs, see the light ).
By; askmeanything2♡
Answer: The heavy price exacted by westward American expansion from Native American groups, cultures, and traditions
This should be the correct answer. Hope this helps!
Answer:
The central idea of the essay is insightful, focusing on the discomfort and loneliness Rinko and the speaker feel as a result of the expectations of family and peers. The evidence is skillfully selected and explained, clearly supporting the central idea. For example, Rinko is "'locked in a silk cocoon and can barely bend.'" The discomfort manifests itself metaphorically when "Rinko is literally restricted by the Kimono and Japanese lifestyle," and the speaker at Somewhere Among says, "'I am between two cultures, two languages, two time zones every day.'" The essay explains that "she [the speaker] is not comfortable being an alleged 'half or double'." Ideas are cleverly organized and explain the stages of the characters' feelings. The second paragraph of the body presents his experiences with loneliness. The conclusion expands the ideas that the narrator and the speaker are "much more than two races" and elaborates the message that "to feel happy and complete ... you should feel proud of who you are". The writer demonstrates full awareness of the writing task.
Explanation:
Please see attachment for more details
Answer:
Deductive argument.
Explanation:
A deductive argument can be defined as a type of argument that begins with a factual statement to draw a conclusion. It is a factual and logical reasoning. This argument states that if the premises are true that the conclusion drawn must be true as well.
It applies a 'top-bottom' principle which means that first general statements are made then these statements are narrowed to reach the conclusion.
<u>In the given statement, two premises are stated either Jack can enroll in full-time school or buy a car. Then the statement got narrowed when he thought to enroll in a full-time school than buying a car. Then the conclusion drawn was that he had to put off buying the car</u>.
So, the correct answer is deductive reasoning.
