The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws. If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," then here are the two reasons for his defense of civil disobedience (1) h<span>e upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws.</span>
Introduction (Hook, Thesis, thematic Statement)
Body Paragraphs(Explanation)
Conclusion(Restate Thesis, summarize essay)
Answer:
When I told my brother to take a shower cause he stank. Keep in mind he had not showered for 6 days straight. He argued he didn't but I told him he's gone nose blind from smelling his own stink all day. Hee wouldn't know. So, to test it, he ended up taking a shower. Since he washed all of the stink off his body, he didn't actually smell how bad he was before he showered until went back into his room. He smelt his preshowered stank throughout his room and that's when he admitted that he was wrong.
Answer:
i hope this is what you're looking for,
A good argument must have: true premises, be valid or strong, and have premises that are more plausible than its conclusion.