1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Free_Kalibri [48]
2 years ago
9

Mark each description if it is a feature of ancient Indus cities.

History
1 answer:
Gennadij [26K]2 years ago
7 0
The early phase of the civilization lasted from circa 3300 BC until 2800 BC. This saw farming settlements grow into large and sophisticated urban centres. The quality of municipal town planning indicates that these communities were controlled by efficient governments. These clearly placed a high priority on accessibility to water. Modern scholars tend to see in this the influence of a religion which places a string emphasis on ritual washing - much like modern Hinduism. Hygiene was also important to the inhabitants. The urban planning included the world's first known urban sanitation systems. Within the city, people obtained water from wells. Within their homes, some rooms had facilities in which waste water was directed to covered drains. These lined the major streets. These ancient Indus sewerage and drainage systems were far in advance of anything found in contemporary urban sites in the Middle East. The advanced architecture and construction techniques of the Indus cities is shown by their impressive dockyards, granaries, warehouses, brick platforms, and protective walls. Their massive walls were probably designed to protect them as much from floods as from attack. Most city dwellers were traders or artisans. They lived with others of the same occupation in well-defined neighbourhoods. Although some houses were larger than others, Indus civilization cities do not show the kind of massive gulf between wealthy and poor dwellings that is found in those of other civilizations. Their society seems to have been egalitarian to a remarkable degree - but perhaps we should not make too much of this until the civilization in understood more, as this seems to contradict so much of what we know about other ancient societies. However, all the houses had access to water and drainage facilities, which gives the impression of a society where even the poor had a decent standard of living (though there may have been extensive "shanty towns" outside the walls, which have left scant archaeological remains). http://www.timemaps.com/civilization/Indus-Valley-civilization<span> :) All that info will Help u</span>
You might be interested in
Question 7 of 10
kodGreya [7K]

Answer:

i think it's going to be D

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Which three current European countries were once satellite states under Soviet control?
Assoli18 [71]

Answer:

Almost every country to the east of west Germany

1. Poland

2. east Germany

3. Romania

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who refused to continue their journey to freedom? harriet tubman
Juli2301 [7.4K]

Answer:

Harriet Tubman...??

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one of Japan's primary goals during World War I?
soldier1979 [14.2K]

In WW1 Japan was a growing empire trying to take more land and get more resources to become a world power. Imperialism is the main reason they entered WW1.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is it important to not concentrate too much power in one branch of government? Give examples of what might happen if there w
Sati [7]
It is important not to concentrate too much power in one branch of government because then the laws will be practically unstable and inefficient. If there were too much power in the Executive Branch, people would be very accusatory and rights would be extremely limited. If the Legislative Branch had too much power, nobody would be able to truly define the laws and enforce them based on the definitions of the laws created. If the Judicial Branch had too much power, there probably wouldn’t be a lot of laws made or enforced, and controversy would be very high within the Courts. It would be necessary for one branch to exercise more power than another branch if the case defender and antagonist disagreed constantly. An example of this is Marbury v. Madison case, where the power of judicial review was exercised by the Judicial Branch to interpret who won the case (which in that case was James Madison). Another instance would be the Worcester v. Georgia case, where the power of interpretation was used to define the final decision that Cherokees were not obligated to follow Georgia’s laws.
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what way was the empire of Ghana different from the later empire of Mali
    14·1 answer
  • 17)
    5·1 answer
  • By the end of 1920s buying slowed because
    11·1 answer
  • During world war ll, which of the following texas cities did not have petroleum-related industry.
    9·1 answer
  • What country was blamed and ordered to pay for damages of the war? (World War 1)
    13·1 answer
  • Why would a department that is traditionally focused on domestic issues become involved in foreign policy-making
    9·1 answer
  • How do you feel about the braceros?
    7·1 answer
  • Would you consider Louis XIV a successful absolute monarch? Give examples from the text to support your answer.
    10·1 answer
  • Help ASAP plz ??????
    6·1 answer
  • Cuba is called the Pearl of the
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!