Answer:
In my perspective, Cassie should not have got revenge. I think your essay is perfect if I do say so myself. If you would lie to add more figuretive language, I suggest you give some thing that happened to you, and put it in there, make it even more interesting. It's your decision, but I personally think It's perfect.
Explanation:
Harper Lee shows in Atticus' speech how much the human being tends to be unfair, ignorant, and maintain a negative hierarchy between people.
<h3>What does Atticus emphasize in the final speech?</h3>
- It shows how society is naturally racist.
- He claims that this racism leads to injustice.
- It shows how society is hierarchical.
- It shows how everyone is affected by it.
Atticus' final speech occurs when he fails to defend an innocent man and deliver him from death, even with proof of his innocence. Given this fact, he shows that it is human nature to be unfair when it comes to situations involving people of low hierarchical levels in society.
This makes him point out that the human being is biased and that he ignores the truth if it doesn't benefit him.
More information about Atticus at the link:
brainly.com/question/11985806
Answer:
Alex Garland’s 2015 science fiction film Ex Machina follows a young programmer’s attempts to determine whether or not an android possesses a consciousness complicated enough to pass as human. The film is celebrated for its thought-provoking depiction of the anxiety over whether a nonhuman entity could mimic or exceed human abilities, but analyzing the early sections of the film, before artificial intelligence is even introduced, reveals a compelling examination of humans’ inability to articulate their thoughts and feelings. In its opening sequence, Ex Machina establishes that it’s not only about the difficulty of creating a machine that can effectively talk to humans, but about human beings who struggle to find ways to communicate with each other in an increasingly digital world.
The piece's opening introduces the film with a plot summary that doesn't give away too much and a brief summary of the critical conversation that has centered around the film. Then, however, it deviates from this conversation by suggesting that Ex Machina has things to say about humanity before non-human characters even appear. Off to a great start.
The film’s first establishing shots set the action in a busy modern office. A woman sits at a computer, absorbed in her screen. The camera looks at her through a glass wall, one of many in the shot. The reflections of passersby reflected in the glass and the workspace’s dim blue light make it difficult to determine how many rooms are depicted. The camera cuts to a few different young men typing on their phones, their bodies partially concealed both by people walking between them and the camera and by the stylized modern furniture that surrounds them. The fourth shot peeks over a computer monitor at a blonde man working with headphones in. A slight zoom toward his face suggests that this is an important character, and the cut to a point-of-view shot looking at his computer screen confirms this. We later learn that this is Caleb Smith (Domhnall Gleeson), a young programmer whose perspective the film follows.
The rest of the sequence cuts between shots from Caleb’s P.O.V. and reaction shots of his face, as he receives and processes the news that he has won first prize in a staff competition. Shocked, Caleb dives for his cellphone and texts several people the news. Several people immediately respond with congratulatory messages, and after a moment the woman from the opening shot runs in to give him a hug. At this point, the other people in the room look up, smile, and start clapping, while Caleb smiles disbelievingly—perhaps even anxiously—and the camera subtly zooms in a bit closer. Throughout the entire sequence, there is no sound other than ambient electronic music that gets slightly louder and more textured as the sequence progresses. A jump cut to an aerial view of a glacial landscape ends the sequence and indicates that Caleb is very quickly transported into a very unfamiliar setting, implying that he will have difficulty adjusting to this sudden change in circumstances.
These paragraphs are mostly descriptive. They give readers the information they will need to understand the argument the piece is about to offer. While passages like this can risk becoming boring if they dwell on unimportant details, the author wisely limits herself to two paragraphs and maintains a driving pace through her prose style choices (like an almost exclusive reliance on active verbs).
Answer:
'Had Bought'
Explanation:
The infinitive 'to buy' turns into 'had bought' in past perfect. The PAST TENSE is simply 'bought', but the PAST PERFECT tense is 'had bought'.
Can you give me the passage i can then answer your question
