How might the anti-immigrant arguments of wealthy nativists have differed from those of less-affluent nativists?

1 answer:

4 0

America is a country that is about completely composed of immigrants
Immigrants have been oppressed for their labor, nonetheless, used as scapegoats for problems that begin in the country as of approach to amending the political, economic, and social institutions.
Anti-emigrationists feelings have risen in the country on these minority groups. An example of such explicit racial discrimination is on Mexican and Latino immigrants who make up about a third of the country's immigrants.

You might be interested in

Why did many immigrants come to the United States from Germany in the mid-1840's?

Law Incorporation [45]

Answer:

Explanation:

In the decade from 1845 to 1855, more than a million Germans fled to the United States to escape economic hardship. They also sought to escape the political unrest caused by riots, rebellion and eventually a revolution in 1848.

5 0

3 years ago

Compare the federal government's role in the fight against communism with its role in the fight against racial discrimination. H

DedPeter [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

If we make a comparison between the federal government's role in the fight against communism with its role in the fight against racial discrimination, we find considerable differences.

During the Red Scare of the 1920s, the federal government of the United States was very concerned about the presence of anarchists and communists in the United States territory. That is why US President Woodrow Wilson ordered the Department of Justice to initiate the Palmer Raids to arrest communists and anarchists.

During the Second Red Scare in the times of Wisconsin Republican Senator Joseph McCartney, he accused the presence of communists in the interior of the US federal government and the military. The problem was that he accused but never presented valid evidence.

One way or the other the federal government was worried, concerned, and act in many different ways.

Regarding the fight against racial discrimination, the federal government has acted very differently. It seems that the government is not as interested as in the above-mentioned cases. It seems that it has not the same political interest as in the case of anarchism or communism. Truly, racism is not the first thing on the political agenda of the US.

How involved were citizens in these fights?

Citizens basically reacted with fear during the Red Sacre times. The government and mass media told them to be fearful of communist, and they were afraid. And they started to accuse people with no evidence at all.

Regarding the fight against racism, here it seems that some US citizens are more concerned about this issue and have actively participated in public demonstrations.

4 0

2 years ago

Write a two-to three-sentence statement explaining how each goal relates to and promotes U.S. national

Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:

One of the U.S national interest is be a secure nation for all the population that lives there, enhancing the safeguard.

1. Prevent and stop the cyberattacks this will help to reduce notoriously the amount of violent situations in schools and also the percentage selfdestruction in youth. - Control the weapons sales and permissions as well.

2. Maintain the global balance of power between the authority and civilians, educate the population and eradicate the racism and unpunished deaths.

3. Ensure the viability and stability of global systems like trade, financial markets, supplies of energy and climate. Create training programs, adviser's offices, educate families and entrepreneurs about how the market can change and teach them how to be prepared, impose sanctions to the factories and companies that does not have values relatedwith the climate emergency and compel all the resources to make them do it.

6 0

3 years ago

Of the following sources,where might you expect to find biased information?

snow_lady [41]

While you didn't provide any possible sources, we can expect that biased information would be found when you would look for information from people who are involved in the situation that is being discussed. Imagine a soldier from Germany discussing his viewpoint of World War II. He would most likely give you a biased account. At least, when compared to a postwar historical analysis of that same situation.

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following Supreme Court cases decided that racial segregation in public places was constitutional

Papessa [141]

Plessy v ferguson!! i think anyways it established the "separate but equal" thing

7 0

3 years ago