1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liubo4ka [24]
3 years ago
8

What was a difference between British and French approaches to colonialism?

History
2 answers:
PSYCHO15rus [73]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is A.

Due to the long distance between the colonies and England, the British allowed colonist to set up local governments and tax themselves. They allowed their collonies to self-govern for practical reasons.

On the other hand, French collonies were completely subjected to the French king, and did not posses any form of self-government.

julsineya [31]3 years ago
5 0
Britain trained colonies for self-governing

France expected that their colonies would always be part of France. They used an approach of assimilation which involved introducing their culture to the colonies. Britain trained their colonies to be self-governing. They were treated as self-governing entities with colonialists to govern them.



You might be interested in
Select the answer choice from the drop-down lists to complete the sentence
Airida [17]
Northwest Passage and Gold
4 0
3 years ago
What was the goal of the Espionage Act of 1917?
DochEvi [55]

Answer:

a. to make spying illegal

Explanation: is correct

5 0
2 years ago
What state now exists by<br> the area claimed by new york<br> and new hampshers
finlep [7]

Answer:

Vermont.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What did the United states do in 1924 to anger the Japanese?
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

The Immigration Act

Explanation:

The Immigration Act of 1924 limited the number of immigrants allowed entry into the United States through a national origins quota

3 0
3 years ago
What were some effects of the dissultions of the solviet union on the United States
Orlov [11]

Fall of the Soviet Union. In December of 1991, as the world watched in amazement, the Soviet Union disintegrated into fifteen separate countries. Its collapse was hailed by the west as a victory for freedom, a triumph of democracy over totalitarianism, and evidence of the superiority of capitalism over socialism.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was one reason union membership rose in the 1930s?
    12·2 answers
  • After the war, he became the first African American to serve
    12·2 answers
  • Who had the idea that there should be 3 branches of government
    7·1 answer
  • What is the ultimate goal of a Hindu when they seek to escape the cycle of rebirth and reunite with the Brahman?
    10·2 answers
  • Which three major segments of the population were excluded from the convention
    13·1 answer
  • What was the primary reason that the Northern Whigs joined with other citizens to form the Republican Party in 1854?
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!! What were the 3 specific things that came out the Great Compromise?
    10·1 answer
  • Pharaohs add acres to the land that farmers what was the effect of them adding more acres of land?
    13·1 answer
  • A pile of dirt is at a temperature of 30°F. Then it is combined with another pile of dirt at the same temperature.
    8·2 answers
  • Use the following chart about the Triangular Trade to answer the question:
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!