1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liubo4ka [24]
3 years ago
8

What was a difference between British and French approaches to colonialism?

History
2 answers:
PSYCHO15rus [73]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is A.

Due to the long distance between the colonies and England, the British allowed colonist to set up local governments and tax themselves. They allowed their collonies to self-govern for practical reasons.

On the other hand, French collonies were completely subjected to the French king, and did not posses any form of self-government.

julsineya [31]3 years ago
5 0
Britain trained colonies for self-governing

France expected that their colonies would always be part of France. They used an approach of assimilation which involved introducing their culture to the colonies. Britain trained their colonies to be self-governing. They were treated as self-governing entities with colonialists to govern them.



You might be interested in
The opening of the Preamble (“We the People of the United States…”) suggests that the power of this government is derived from w
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

D. Consent of the citizens .

Explanation:

In the US Constitution we see the principle of popular sovereignty embodied and expressed. It is one of the most important ideas of Enlightenment. Sovereignty lies with the people, not in an absolute monarch claiming to rule by divine right.  It is up to the people to decide who should rule them.

6 0
3 years ago
What other rulers in Europe were concerned about events in France? explain in detail
Setler79 [48]
<span> they didn't like the idea of revolution spreading to their countries and them potentially losing their heads. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
What was the main goal of the final solution
My name is Ann [436]

The sole purpose of the final solution was that Hitler and the Nazi's were aiming to create a master race Hitler called this the Aryan race.

7 0
3 years ago
Why would slavery be an issue when the United States added these new territories ? How did this contribute to the growing tensio
castortr0y [4]

Answer:

The compromise lasted until the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, when Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas proposed legislation allowing the issue of slavery to be decided in the new territories. ... Once the transatlantic slave trade was prohibited, domestic slave trading throughout the South increased.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Under Jawaharlal Nehru, India pursued a policy of:
satela [25.4K]

Answer:

c is correct

Explanation:

mark it as brainlist and follow me

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • BRAINLIESTTTT ASAP!!!<br><br> -How did imperialism impact Africa and other parts of Asia?
    11·2 answers
  • During the French Revolution, The rest of Europe mainly _____.
    11·1 answer
  • What is the first year that the philadelphia warriors won the championship?
    12·1 answer
  • The Justinian Code is important because it was a collection of the __________. A. Laws of the Roman Empire B. Teachings of Jesus
    13·1 answer
  • The American ships and planes were in a peacetime condition of readiness, not geared for attack. The guns were without ammunitio
    15·2 answers
  • Which tribe saw its population grow significantly after going to a reservation and returning to ancestral ways of herding horse,
    13·1 answer
  • EASY QUESTION FOR 40 POINTS!!
    5·1 answer
  • The Bill of Rights is the name of which of the following?
    13·2 answers
  • Name of ships estevanico Morocco had
    12·1 answer
  • How many republicans and democrats were in the white house in the 1920s
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!