Do not let other people affect who you want to be. be yourself
Answer:
The correct answer for this situation is: B. False
To exclude identification evidence on due process grounds, defendants have to prove (by a preponderance of the evidence) that the totality of the circumstances shows the identification procedure to have been unnecessarily suggestive and that this unnecessarily suggestive procedure created.
Explanation:
There is a very important part missing here. To exclude identification evidence on due process grounds, defendants have to prove that the unnecessarily suggestive procedure created a very substantial likelihood or misidentification. In other words, it would be valid. Therefore, the correct answer is false.
Answer:
Concurrent validity
Explanation:
Concurrent validity is one approach of criterion validity that estimates individual performance on different tests at approximately the same time.
Answer: The correct answer is A: Falsifiability
Explanation: <u>Falsifiability characterizes a theory, statement or model that can be proven wrong. </u>
<u>For a theory to be proven scientific it has to be falsifiable. </u>
<u>If a theory cannot be either proved or disproved it is not falsifiable and thus, cannot be considered scientific. </u>
<u>In this particular case, the levels-of-processing-model proposed by Craik and Lockhart (1972) does not have a way of scientifically being proven or disproven hence its falsifiability.</u>
<u>The correct answer is A.</u>