1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lina20 [59]
4 years ago
12

One potential congressional tool for ending a war is cutting funding for the war. negotiating peace treaties. replacing the secr

etary of defense. canceling weapons system orders. sending an ultimatum with unanimous signatures to the president.
History
2 answers:
Mama L [17]4 years ago
8 0
<span>According to the references such as books and sites that I've read, I came to a conclusion to your question. The answer to the question "One potential congressional tool for ending a war is..." is "cutting funding for the war".</span>
densk [106]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

War will start when negotiations can not be solved in the two countries ' problems. Even though most people hate it, the war continues until two hostile countries have found a mutually beneficial agreement. It is possible to avoid war by preventing its funding.

Explanation:

Indeed, the decision to prevent war is complex and has its implications for two hostile countries and may have an impact on other countries.

• Cutting funding for the war

The war can continue due to significant donation-country funding. The motive of this war funding is to protect the interests of the war-torn countries. If this funding for the war is stopped, it is not impossible to prevent a larger war. Because of all this, the war will never stop as long as the major countries that have an interest in continuing to carry out funding, especially to other countries to take out ' Proxy War.’

• Negotiating peace

This second strategy may look naive, but many government authorities are still conducting peace negotiations to prevent war. Although much is achieved, this strategy seems not to be efficient. Countries that do not approve negotiations and feel disadvantaged will continue to do different ways of defending their interests, including going to war in the future to press the enemy to implement the invading state's will.

• Canceling weapons system orders

During the Cold War, the arms system of the world was aimed at two major countries, the Soviet Union and the United States. The end of the Cold War, however, made the nation multipolar and canceled the implementation of a policy on arms systems it is too hard. Every action will continue to produce the strongest weapons to defend themselves against all threats.

• Sending ultimatum

At first, it was effective to make an ultimatum to other war-affected countries. However, in the ultimatum round, each country has a different perception. It could be that an ultimatum is seen as a guarantee that their defense systems will be improved again by the new nation. They will then seek to attempt another nation before another country threatens their nation.

Learn More

If you’re interested learning more about this topic, we recomended you also take a look at the following question:

• What war was called the "great war"? brainly.com/question/3445478

• How is the Seven Years War related to the French and Indian War? brainly.com/question/3223999

Keyword :  War

Subject  :  History

Class  :  College

Subchapter :  

You might be interested in
Besides many deaths, other effects of the plague included _____.
postnew [5]
Persecution of many people groups. For example, the  Jews

(im thinking that you are asking about the black plaque. If not, i will change it )

hope this helps
6 0
4 years ago
Bakit mahalagang kumain ng masusustansyang pagkain?​
aleksandrvk [35]
Sapagkat ito ay mabuti para sa iyong katawan at pinapanatili kang malusog at hindi may sakit
6 0
3 years ago
Use your new knowledge of Japanese Internment during WW2 to answer the questions below in one well-developed, cohesive paragraph
Darina [25.2K]

The Japanese Internment camps were made because of the fear of espionage in the US, and that can be seen in both positive and negative manner.

Explanation:

When the tensions started to rise between Japan and the United States, it was clear that war between the two is coming almost certainly. The Japanese had huge aspirations, not just in the Pacific, but they also wanted to disable the United States on the long term so that they don't have any threat in the region. The United States officials were not feeling very comfortable with the aggressive Japanese policies, so they too started to prepare, but also to make some decisions in panic.

There were thousands of Americans that had Japanese ancestry, most of the living along the West Coast, which was also the target of Japan. The American government, in panic, order that all people of Japanese ancestry to be put in Internment camps, as they were afraid that they will help Japan on the ground, and perform espionage.

While this might have seemed as a good move by the Americans, as they tried to eliminate the threat on time on their soil, it is not that simple. There was actually not a single proof, that even a single person of Japanese ancestry in the United States was supporting and collaborating with the Japanese Empire. In truth, the basic human rights were violated, and despite the possible threat, without having any evidence, people should not be treated as criminals.

Learn more about the problems that Japan faced in building an empire brainly.com/question/823460

#learnwithBrainly

5 0
3 years ago
Communist China's policy in the 1960s of reigniting the revolutionary spirit, which involved mass jailing and executions, was ca
grigory [225]
D. Cultural Revolution. In order to preserve true Communist ideology to China and its populace, Mao Zedong (the Chairman of the Communist Party of China) launched a campaign to purge the capitalism from Chinese society. He imposed the Maoist ideology within his Party and the Chinese society.
6 0
3 years ago
What crisis did Dwight Eisenhower use the Eisenhower Doctrine to justify a military response to a communist threat?
Anarel [89]
I  believe the answer is Suez Crisis.
Eisenhower Argued that if the Communist countries able to control this region, they could control the largest oil reserve that exist in this world, which would become a danger for United states safety in the future.
He used this argument to justify the military response.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What were the two basic causes of the Dust Bowl during the early 1930s?
    10·2 answers
  • The forth amendment protects citizens from________.
    14·1 answer
  • What job did ronald reagan hold in des moines, iowa, after graduating from college?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the south feel no need to employ immigrants?
    13·1 answer
  • In the online article, "Run Out on the Rails", the author states that whites ignored Chinese workers as long as: Question 4 opti
    7·1 answer
  • How is state's judicial system organized???
    11·1 answer
  • What caused the cattle industry to grow and n the 19th century
    7·2 answers
  • Im famous and popular im red and always get a picture people love me what am i
    8·2 answers
  • In the New World, education in the settlements was emphasized. Check all the facts which apply:
    12·1 answer
  • SHORT ESSAY FOR 75 POINTS !! (advanced history)
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!