Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The widespread revolution in Europe can be traced to the year 1848 which is often referred to as the Age of revolution, starting from the French Revolution. They are a lot of reasons or forces that galvanized revolution among the poor and middle classes in Europe. Some of which are the following:
1. Broad discontentment with political leadership specifically against the monarchy.
2. The needs to be represented in government and democracy, similar to the American "tax without representation."
3. Agitations for freedom of speech and press
4. Demands in the areas of a good standard of living, better wages and working conditions, and an increase in nationalism.
The dutch accepted china's restrictions on trade; the british didn't. british refused to preform the "kowtow" ritual
Answer:
Abstract:
A government that does not guarantee freedom, equality, happiness and respect for the rights of all citizens must be overthrown by the people, who must raise another government that guarantees all these elements given by God to men.
Explanation:
A summary should include the main ideas of the original text, but in a shorter and faster narrative, using a few words, but always highlighting the main theme of the original text.
Based on this, the summary above was made from the paragraph of the declaration of independence shown in the question above, where it reinforces the government's obligation to guarantee the security, freedom, equality and happiness of its people, and may be removed from power if that responsibility is neglected.
Answer:
D. British soldiers placed in Boston were provoked by colonists throwing stones and fired in the croud, killing 5 Americans.
The state of Louisiana enacted a law that required separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Homer Adolph Plessy-- who was seven-eighths Caucasian-- took a seat in a "white's only" car of a Louisiana train. He refused to move to the car reserved for blacks and was arrested.
QUESTION:
Is Louisiana's law mandating racial segregation on its trains an unconstitutional infringement on both the privileges and immunities and the equal protection clauses of the 14th amendment. (Is it unconstitutional, basically.)
ANSWER: No the state law is within constitutional boundaries. The judges based their decision on the separate-but-equal doctrine (keep in mind this was in 1896), that separate facilities for blacks and whites satisfied the Fourteenth Amendment so long as they were equal. In this case, they ruled that segregation does not, in itself, constitute unlawful discrimination.
Basically everything about Plessey v. Ferguson.
