1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vanyuwa [196]
3 years ago
6

What do Robert Johnson and Lionel Sosa have in common

History
1 answer:
Pavlova-9 [17]3 years ago
4 0

The book was fiction but based on the things Sinclair had seen. (Progressive) ... He believed that African Americans should strive for full rights immediately. He helped found the .... He ran on a campaign based on the common man and he participated in the McCarthy Communist scare. ... Robert Johnson ... Lionel Sosa.

You might be interested in
HELP I HAVE A TIME LIMIT!!!!!!!!!!! ITS 25 POINTS!!!!!!!
qaws [65]

Answer: C) The person must be a resident of Texas for a minium of 5 years prior to the election.

Explanation: This means the person who wants to run for governor of Texas must live there for at least 5 years prior to the election.

I hope this helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Approximately how many of Texas farmers affected by the dust bowl migration to other areas
aliya0001 [1]

Answer: one-third

Explanation:

bc I got the question right

7 0
3 years ago
why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0
3 years ago
Where was the original location of the Mayas?
kolbaska11 [484]
The answer is “The original location was Mexico”
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This map shows the Roman Republic in the year 43 BCE. Using this map, which statement regrading the Roman Republic is MOST LIKEL
Leni [432]
A . It explored North America
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are five sequential events that made the United States a super power leading to 1918?
    9·1 answer
  • How was the 1996 presidential campaign unique in modern politics?
    12·1 answer
  • What was one advantage of the steamboat that robert fulton created?
    13·1 answer
  • MacArthur claimed in his press conference that _________ was at risk.
    5·1 answer
  • Which term describes the idea that a king power is granted to him by god rather than the consent of his subject
    13·2 answers
  • How did Henson feel when the American flag was planted at the North Pole ?
    8·2 answers
  • Write a paragraph explaining why the coming of Jesus into the world is good news.
    6·1 answer
  • How much is Greek geography divided And what are the island
    8·1 answer
  • Part C
    6·1 answer
  • Kept the work of Greek and Roman scientists
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!