Green Revolution in India happened because there was a need for increased agricultural yields due to chronic food deficits and famine. Thus, the answer should be d) enable India to feed all of its people.
Answer: C is Indus Valley
and D is China
Explanation:
This map shows the first River Valley civilizations, whose main feature is that they were nations or agricultural civilizations located near a river, which was their development center.
Among these civilizations can be identified on the map the following:
-Mesopotamia (marked as B), which was the oldest civilization (formed around 3500 BC) and grew around the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.
-Egypt (marked as A), whihc was a civilization that created irrigation systems around the Nile River.
-The Indus Valley (marked with C), formed around 3300 B.C. and considered a Bronze Age civilization, which developed around the Indus River in present-day Afghanistan, Pakistan and northwestern India. Being its two most important cities: Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro (now Pakistan).
-The area of the Yellow River, China (marked with D); which was called the Mother River by the inhabitants. This civilization was established around 4000 B.C.
Community corrections have traditionally emphasized "rehabilitation", since the goal of corrections facilities is to "rehabilitate" the offenders who did wrong--meaning that they can re-enter society and be productive.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Whatever you decide will affect the rest of your life, whether positively or negatively.
As I understand it, Laissez-faire ideology maintains that the "free market" is the best way to determine what businesses can and should do. This means that businesses, in competition with one another, should be free to determine their paths free from any government rules or regulations. The belief is that the competition among various businesses will ultimately result in the best outcomes for society in general - Adam Smith's "invisible hand". As part of this philosophy, workers should also be free to compete with each other and choose to work wherever they wish and this process will also result in the best results for the workers as well.
However, isn't there a huge assumption in this philosophy? Doesn't the whole justification of this belief depends on the condition that there is perfect competition and that any company and any worker have the equal ability to compete with one another?
What if there is no perfect competition? What if some companies have advantages - due to any of a whole array of reasons - that place them in a non-competitive position vis a vis their competitors? Without perfect competition then other companies are not necessarily able to compete with other companies that have certain advantages. If such a situation exists, then advantaged companies may have the ability to pursue a course that results in their private benefit, but not necessarily to the benefit of society as a whole. The same would apply to workers in that reduced competition among companies would result in decreased leverage for potential employees.
To recap, if the Laissez-faire ideology maintains the best economic policy for society as a whole, and it depends on there being perfect competition on an ongoing basis with minimal government intervention, doesn't it fall apart if there is less than the perfect competition?
