Answer:
1. Allowed California to enter the Union as a free state
2. New states to decide if they will be free or slave
3. Allowed forgiveness of Texas's debt in exchange for land
Explanation:
In US history, the Compromise of 1850 refers to a series of legislative measures proposed by Kentucky Senator <u>Henry Clay </u>and unanimously adopted by Congress and the messenger as law. Senator Henry Clay was later called a "major compromise."
Clay hoped to strike a balance between anti-slavery and anti-slavery states. His plan included five parts. First, California needed to be recognized as a free state, a decision that led to an imbalance in the Senate. Second, $ 10 million of Texas debt would be taken over by the federal government in exchange for giving up the state to the country in the southwest. Third, areas that later split from Texas became the states of New Mexico and Utah. Both states have left their own paths as to whether to adopt or resist slavery. Fourth, the District of Columbia abolished the slave trade, but slavery only continued. Finally, the Fugitive Law was amended and the federal government assumed the role of handling runaway slaves from state governments.
Answer:
He learned that it is necessary to make preparations before taking any government decision, it is necessary to be strategic, especially in military campaigns.
Explanation:
Mehmat had already caused a strong decline in the Ottoman empire, due to unprepared and poorly planned missions. However, he learned from his mistakes and took a different stand when he ascended the throne again. Mehmat, learned to make strategies, to think before making decisions, to establish a plan and to delimit all the steps, mainly in military campaigns.
The answer is letter C.) <span>a newspaper editorial about families who were displaced.
A newspaper editorial refers to the opinion of a leading staff or writer of a newspaper. This would share data on how families were affected by the </span><span>Great Chicago Fire, through the lens of an educated staff. The other sources presented only speak a small percentage of the families/people affected by the fire.
</span>
T<span>hank you for posting your question. I hope you found what you were after. Please feel free to ask me more</span>
Yes if they didn’t observe and study real plants and animals then all the things we know now wouldn’t be true
