I'm assuming by "status," you mean "states." If not, please correct me so I can correct my answer.
The federal government knew that African-Americans would face backlash from Southern White males, so they wanted to prevent that from occurring at all.
I hope this answer helped you! If you have any further questions or concerns, feel free to ask! :)
Answer:
D. The source is not credible because it contains more opinions than facts.
Explanation:
From the analysis of the excerpt, information of the author, and the source of the material, it can be concluded that " The source is not credible because it contains more opinions than facts."
This is evident in that, the author is a high school student which does not make him "an authority" in the subject. Also, the website is not a reliable source for peer-reviewed or scholarly articles.
Also, there were a series of recorded conflicts, fights, or wars between the European settlers and the Native Americans. For example Proclamation of 1763 & Pontiac's War, Battle of Point Pleasant, etc.
Hence, the correct answer is option D
Answer:
the text evidence that describes the detail
The court ruled in favor of Brown, stating that American state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools were not constitutional, even if segregated schools were at the time established (and “of the same quality”)
Answer: I'm pretty sure it's A, but don't quote me on that, sorry.
Explanation:
