Answer:
Wait I think they use Baleen and fins in the same time but what I think the most of Fins I don't think I'm right but it has to be Baleen but if I'm wrong then it will be Fins
Answer:
C - The president uses parallelism to emphasize how widespread the attacks were.
Explanation:
Option C aptly captures the rhetoric of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt rendition. Remember, the focal point of this assignment is to evaluate the speech of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Parallelism is an integral tool in human communication. Put succinctly, it seeks to establish a balance view and understanding from the attentive audience. Hence, it draws on a lot of parallels and standing facts and figures that the attentive audience can relate with. With this, study has shown that a good use if parallelism has a way of boosting the effectiveness of communication. That is, it accelerate the understanding of the receivers.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt conspicuously deployed parallelism in his speeches with Americans during the war. He basically deploy this to bring to fore matters arising at the theater of the war events. And by drawing on the varying available information around, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt is able to effectively communicate and relate with his people.
Hence, amidst all the options enlisted, option C is the appropriate answer.
The features to present in 2023 z’s responsive a/t acceleration are:
- -2.0-liter 4-cylinder engine
- -Xtronic CVT®
<h3>What is a
responsive acceleration?</h3>
It is a features that allows the engine to move quickly in seconds to the maximum speed.
Hence, while demonstrating the 2023 z’s responsive a/t acceleration, we will point out the -2.0-liter 4-cylinder engine and Xtronic CVT
Read more about responsive acceleration
<em>brainly.com/question/14799138</em>
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Supreme Court Justice Holmes once included this statement in a majority opinion: "During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished." This statement informed the Supreme Court's later decisions on freedom of speech in that in times of war, citizens are not allowed to express comments or critics that could compromise the national security of the country. So in this case, freedom of speech could be suppressed during the time of war.
In the past, there had been incidents that could have compromised the strategy of the war due to some espionage activities. That is why the federal government has to be cautious with the information that is shared during war times.
