International law defines genocide in terms of violence committed “with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group,” yet this approach fails to acknowledge the full impacts of cultural destruction. There is insufficient international discussion of “cultural genocide,” which is a particular threat to the world's indigenous minorities. Despite the recent adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which acknowledges the rights to culture, diversity, and self-determination, claims of cultural genocide are often derided, and their indicators dismissed as benign effects of modernity and indigenous cultural diffusion. This article considers the destruction of indigenous cultures and the forced assimilation of indigenous peoples through the analytical lens of genocide. Two case studies—the federally unrecognized Winnemem Wintu tribe in northern California and the Inuit of northern Canada—are highlighted as illustrative examples of groups facing these challenges. Ultimately, this article seeks to prompt serious discussion of cultural rights violations, which often do not involve direct physical killing or violence, and consideration of the concept “cultural genocide” as a tool for human rights promotion and protection.
Fire is a natural part of the grassland ecosystem and helps maintain its health and vigor. It warms up the soil and reduces the leaf litter that accumulates each year, allowing sunlight to penetrate. ... After a fire, blackened fields quickly revive with new, green grasses and abundant, showy wildflowers.
Total number of gumballs in the gumball machine =
23 + 52 + 34 + 61 + 30 = 200
% of the gumballs being red = 52/200 * 100
= 52/2
<u> = 26 %</u>
Hence, <u>26% of the gumballs</u> are red in the gumball machine
Answer and Explanation:
Beginning in 1791 a series of treaties between the United States and the Cherokees living in Georgia gave recognition to the Cherokee as a nation with their own laws and customs. Nevertheless, treaties and agreements gradually whittled away at this land base, and in the late 1700s, some Cherokees sought refuge from white interference by moving to northwestern Arkansas between the White and Arkansas Rivers. Then in 1819, the Cherokee National Council notified the federal government that it would no longer cede land, thus hardening their resolve to remain on their homelands. In 1828, Georgia passed a law pronouncing all laws of the Cherokee Nation to be null and void after June 1, 1830, forcing the issue of states' rights with the federal government. At the same time President Andrew Jackson began to aggressively implement a broad policy of terminating Indian land titles and relocating the Indian population. In 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, which removed Native Americans west of the Mississippi River.
I think it might be D?
Answer:
if you dont know me neither so sorry tho
Explanation:
