The narrator and the man who had died didn't get the chance to have their swimming rematch. The narrator and his military comrades were losers because they never received the needed information from the man that died.The man whom died had a family so the family lost someone who was very dear to them.
Answer:
Definitely the first one, probably the second and third as well?
Explanation:
A first-person narrator is usually recounting an event, so they definitely use 'I'.
A third-person narrator sometimes knows the thoughts of other characters, depending on whether they're omniscient or not.
A first-person narrator is likely to show bias I think, because they're telling the story from their point of view so they're very likely to share their opinions and stuff. I don't really know, you're gonna kinda have to decide on this one.
A third-person narrator sometimes takes part? I mean, if they're third-person limited then usually it's the POV of a character but from a more detached persona? For example, in the Heroes of Olympus series all the chapters are in third person limited but all the characters take part in the action. If it's third-person omniscient then I don't think they'd be taking part in the action, unless the narrator is like a dude from the future recounting events that happened to his younger self and all that stuff. I don't really know, man.
Answer:
yes. people have different types of signatures.
They creates their own signature by thinking themselves.
Some people likes unique signature, some like stylish sinature and some like normal one.
Explanation:
plz mark me brainlist
Answer:
The words that best replace the underlined part of the paragraph to remove the "bandwagon” logical fallacy is<em><u> the number one athletic shoe in the entire world.</u></em>
This is best logical answer to the question asked above.
Explanation:
Answer:
Here are some ideas
Explanation:
For this type of work, keep in mind it isn't a choice that will affect you in any way. Here are some points for each side of the debate:
DISAGREE
- Citizens should have a right to privacy.
- Secretive government actions can result in trust in our society to weaken.
- If spying through technology such as webcams, the wrong person could gain access.
AGREE
- Spying on citizens planning on committing a crime through phone calls could lead to preventing a robbery, murder, or even a terrorist attack.
- The safety of thousands of people could be kept by simply overhearing a conversation.
I really hoped this helps, we,ve all been there
