Yeah i the way to get me the new snap of my mouth shut off 10 11 - www but that’s how i get it divine the point system
The answer is A but i did watch the movie a long time ago so
Well, (the way I see it) when Southern Brewers was the only coffee supplier in the market. They could have prices as high as they'd liked, where else would people get good coffee. And so, Albert Coffee than comes along charging less than the leading supplier. And than Café Brites comes and marks their prices lower than the both of them.
Southern Brewers had to lower prices in order to keep up business. People are more apt to buy low cost idems. So if they wanted to continue being a top supplier, they needed to lower prices.
Answer:
Although their freedom was denied by the law, enslaved African Americans used a ... While enslaved African Americans fought against the strictures of slavery in their daily lives, another ... Remember that you are FOUR MILLIONS! ... effectively use primary sources from the Library's vast digital collections in their teaching.
ExplanaAlthough their freedom was denied by the law, enslaved African Americans used a ... While enslaved African Americans fought against the strictures of slavery in their daily lives, another ... Remember that you are FOUR MILLIONS! ... effectively use primary sources from the Library's vast digital collections in their teaching.
tion:
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
