Answer:
Look down belowwwww!
Explanation:
Ethos:
Ethos is when an argument is constructed based on the ethics or credibility of the person making the argument. Ethos is in contrast to pathos (appealing to emotions) and logos (appealing to logic or reason).
Examples of Ethos:
- A commercial about a specific brand of toothpaste says that 4 out of 5 dentists use it.
Pathos:
Advertisers use the emotions of fear, disgust, and hope to trigger reactions in the audience.
Consider these examples of pathos:
- It's also very easy to see examples of pathos in famous political speeches.
- If we don't move soon, we're all going to die!
- "I'm not just invested in this community - I love every building, every business, every hard-working member of this town."
Logos:
Logos is the persuasive technique that aims to convince an audience by using logic and reason. Also called “the logical appeal,” logos examples in advertisement include the citation of statistics, facts, data, charts, and graphs.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
<u>Basic Rules for Voices:</u>
1) The tense will not be changes EVER.
2) Interchanging of subject and object.
<u>Now, The changing of Voice:</u>
1) Someone signed a new contract. (Past Simple tense)
2) Her sister walked Julie's Dog. (Past Simple tense)
![\rule[225]{225}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crule%5B225%5D%7B225%7D%7B2%7D)
Hope this helped!
<h3>~AH1807</h3>
Answer:
The basis of this argument is that verbs are conjugated only in the present and past tense. If we want to refer to the future, we have to use the auxiliary verb will, or the be going to phrase followed by the verb in present or past, or the present tense. Since in English, there is no change in the conjugation of the verbs for the future, some linguistics claim that there are two tenses (past and present) while others claim that there are three because we form the future tense with the addition of the auxiliary or use present simple or continuous.
Explanation:
Linguistics such as Quicker Al claims that there are two tenses, present, and past since they are expressed by inflections in their verbs, while future does not have inflections. There is no future tense, but there is future time. Time is related to our perception of reality, making the future subjective. On the other side, tense expresses when an action happens, taking into account the moment that the person is speaking. Linguistics such as Hatav or Klein claims three tenses' existence, past, present, and future. They state that we can refer to the future with the addition of the auxiliary verb will, or the phrase be going to, or the use of present simple, or continuous even though there is no specific inflection in the verb, as it happens in other languages like Portuguese or Spanish. They identify the future with the definition of tense.
No the last one is for a question, the proper punctuation would be a period.
