Why was Louis XVI considered ineffectual ?

1 answer:

4 0

Well, for one... Louis the XVI was considerd ineffectual because he was usually depicted as rather a weak sort of king. Not really able to wield the strong centralized state in which his ancestors had crafted.
 *And he was also seen as an honest man, who had good intensions, but who was most likely unfit for the strong task of reforming the monarchy; He basically wasnt the best man for the job... 
~Therefore, He was ineffectual, just like the question states...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~Hope this helped! Anymore questions, please feel free to ask. :)

You might be interested in

What was typical of city tenement buildings?

astra-53 [7]

A . lack of windows is correct

7 0

3 years ago

Really ugernt pls help its world history . 1. What factors caused the foundation of Athenian Democracy? 2. What rights did an At

Mariana [72]

Answer:hey just try you best, you'll get it eventually

Explanation:

3 0

4 years ago

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!! President Johnson was passionate about escalating U.S. involvement in Vietnam and therefore a. stoppin

ZanzabumX [31]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure its c sorry if I'm wrong

4 0

3 years ago

Why did the barons write the Magna Carta, and how did it affect the power of the king?

slavikrds [6]

Answer:

The Magna Carta was written to protect the rights of the barons and eventually, over time the basic rights of English citizens. This limited king John's and future kings rights.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Under the compromise,

disa [49]

Answer:

Missouri's southern Boundary

Explanation:

After the Missouri Compromise was signed by both the CSA and the Union, the law stated that every state that formed underneath Missouri's border was a part of the CSA. It also stated that any state that formed above Missouri's Southern border was a part of the Union. But the Union broke the deal and California became a Union state.

7 0

3 years ago