1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
blsea [12.9K]
3 years ago
6

Why was Louis XVI considered ineffectual ?

History
1 answer:
Alexandra [31]3 years ago
4 0
 <em>Well, for one... Louis the XVI was considerd ineffectual because he was usually depicted as rather a weak sort of king. Not really able to wield the strong centralized state in which his ancestors had crafted.</em>
<em> *And he was also seen as an honest man, who had good intensions, but who was most likely unfit for the strong task of reforming the monarchy; He basically wasnt the best man for the job... </em>
<span><em>~Therefore, He was ineffectual, just like the question states...
</em><em>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</em>
<em>~Hope this helped! Anymore questions, please feel free to ask. :)</em></span>
You might be interested in
How did the lasting machine change how shoes were made?
Rufina [12.5K]

Answer:

D) The lasting machine sped up the process and saved workers time and energy.

Explanation:

:)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the 16th century, the Ottoman Empire grew extremely wealthy because the Ottomans:
Sladkaya [172]

Answer:

They were in charge of the trade route in Europe and asia  

7 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the Aztec and Inca Empires. Explain at least three ways in which they were similar and three ways in which
dybincka [34]
Similarities:

Both empires emerged in the 14th and 15th centuries as postclassic civilizations building on the innovations of earlier political powers but expanding to greater extents

Both empires were entirely infantry, but well supplied, well-organized, and extremely aggressive and militaristic. Javelins, slings, spears and maces were used in battle.

Both empires had inherent instabilities

Both empires were fueled by corn.

Both empires have little to no seafaring, and instead stuck to the mountains and valleys in the center of the region.

Both empires conquered hundreds of cities in the region that resented their rule and taxation

Both empires were ended by Spanish invasions that capitalized on native divisions, introduced disease, and Spanish technology of guns, horses, and steel.

Both empires are misnamed-the Inka was the ruler of Tawantinsuyu, and the Aztecs adopted the name Mexica.

Both empires provided public education

Both Atahualpa and Moctezuma decided against confronting the Spanish militarily, allowing for the Spanish to take the Emperors hostage.

Attempts to restore the monarchy came after the capture and death of the emperor, but were too late.

Differences:

The Incas were bronze age, Aztecs were stone age

THe Incas assigned governors and shuffled conquered peoples around. There was a greater centralization than in Mexico

The Aztecs were a tributary empire, not a direct one.

The Aztecs had writing, while the Incas used Quipu

The Aztecs still had many rivals left unsubdued

The Inca used mostly potatoes while corn was far more dominant in Mexico.

The Inca had llamas, small but important livestock that made transport easier

The Inca had a sophisticated courier system of Chasquis along state-maintained roads

The Inca used bronze axes and halberds, with slings and maces as their main weapons alongside spears. The Aztecs used obsidian swords and glaives instead for close combat, and used javelins far more. Likewise, while Inca military relied on the unit’s experience and officer corps for their quality like the Romans, the Aztecs instead had a feudalistic division between the elite knights and commoners, with advancement by taking captives.

The Inca allowed women into their schools but not commoners. The Aztecs prohibited women but allowed for peasant men to also gain an education.

The diseases that destroyed the Incas came before the Spanish actually arrived in Peru, while the Spanish had been in Mexico for months before the plagues killed the emperor and populace.

Moctezuma’s mistake was trying to use generosity to awe the Spanish and try to coax them on his side, while Atahualpa’s was trying to awe them with his army rather than actually using it.

The Inca political crisis was a civil war between two brothers, while the Aztec’s was a three way duel between the King, the Priests, and the Aristocracy and military.
5 0
3 years ago
Where did the majority of European immigrants reside in the late 1800s?
Pavlova-9 [17]

Correct answer choice is :


<h2>B) In large cities </h2><h2 /><h2>Explanation:</h2><h2 />

The United States encountered significant waves of immigration during the colonial era, the first part of the 19th century and from the 1880s to 1920. Many emigrants came to America endeavoring greater economic chance, while some, such as the Pilgrims in the early 1600s, appeared in search of spiritual liberty.

<h2 />
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the definition of<br> market equilibrium?
Leona [35]

Answer:

Answer Below:

Explanation:

In economics, economic equilibrium is a situation in which economic forces such as supply and demand are balanced and in the absence of external influences the (equilibrium) values of economic variables will not change. For example, in the standard text perfect competition, equilibrium occurs at the point at which quantity demanded and quantity supplied are equal.[1] Market equilibrium in this case is a condition where a market price is established through competition such that the amount of goods or services sought by buyers is equal to the amount of goods or services produced by sellers. This price is often called the competitive price or market clearing price and will tend not to change unless demand or supply changes, and quantity is called the "competitive quantity" or market clearing quantity. But the concept of equilibrium in economics also applies to imperfectly competitive markets, where it takes the form of a Nash equilibrium.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Exit
    13·1 answer
  • Should applicants from certain countries be given priority? Why?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the president role when they help someone campaign for a senate seat
    13·1 answer
  • According to andrew jackson what is required of the national government for it to be worth defending
    10·1 answer
  • NEED HELP 20POINTS NEED ANSWER ASAP!
    15·1 answer
  • Only one answer this time
    10·1 answer
  • 9. What two wars were part of the Cold War?
    8·2 answers
  • HELPPPPPP!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • Why does the author choose to call the individuals who worked on the Underground Railroad "conductors"?
    13·1 answer
  • Define the "Vietnam War" and its significance?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!