1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Levart [38]
4 years ago
8

How far did the pilgrims travel from Plymouth England to Plymouth mass

History
1 answer:
Alex_Xolod [135]3 years ago
5 0
About 2,750 miles<span>, and took the Mayflower 66 days.</span>
You might be interested in
What country did the United States invade in the late 1980s to arrest a dictator on drug charges?
mojhsa [17]
The country is called Panama!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the Dred Scott decision, why did the Supreme Court say that slave owners could legally take their slaves into any territory o
mezya [45]

Answer:

C slaves were considered personal property

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best states an argument of French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau?
VikaD [51]

Answer: In order for a government's laws to be valid, citizens have to agree with those laws.

Explanation:

Rousseau argued against inequality and believed that people are intrinsically good. He believed in democracy.

3 0
3 years ago
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
4 years ago
How would you describe anthony's attitude toward women gaining the right to vote ?
Reptile [31]
I believe that the answer to the question provided above is that Antony supported the battle for suffrage of woman with an optimistic attitude.
Hope my answer would be a great help for you.    If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • as a result of jefferson's concern about government for the common citizen many states passed laws that
    13·1 answer
  • Why will CJ not let the crew into the Oval Office?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements describes the type of government which existed in Florence during the Renaissance
    10·1 answer
  • ____are evidence of religion in
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following are true of Franklin Delano Roosevelt?
    8·1 answer
  • Explain what is meant by the term "blank check" in the build up to the outbreak of World War I.
    14·1 answer
  • 4. Which statement best explains one effect of the New Deal?
    13·2 answers
  • I will give brainliest!!<br> In what war did Napoleon die in???
    5·2 answers
  • How can our system of federalism lead to conflict
    7·1 answer
  • Alex is in a wheelchair goes to the public service building to pay a bill. Unfortunately the place she needs is on the 2nd floor
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!