Han applies option c- he is challenging the credibility of sources. Ramona ,surprised, asks him if the evidence from Pettit's book was from fictional sources. Hans supports his claim through a review of Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this book which had been written by a story-teller and not by a historian was used by Pettit.
Option a- is wrong. Hans is not determining new research goals. He is questioning the credibility of sources.
Option b-is wrong. Hans is evaluating what an author said about Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this 'great' source was used by Pettit in <em>his </em>book.
Option d is wrong. Ramona is asking clarifying questions. She wants Hans to justify his claim. This states that the credibility of sources can be questioned.
Did you read all the explanations? It tells you what you need to do. Or is it a certain part you don’t get? Maybe I can help but I need to know what it is that your struggling with. Also you need a book.
Answer:
"the supposed faculty of perceiving things or events in the future or beyond normal sensory contact."
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the question. Here we just have a series of statements or an excerpt of a text. But you forgot to include the question. We do not know what you are asking for.
However, trying to help, we can comment on the following.
Thi excerpt of the story "Civil Peace," written by Chinua Achebe in 1971, describes the terror the family felt after the dark moments of the Nigerian Civil War that was fought from 1967 to 1970. Jonathan Iwegbu, the main character of the novel, got back to his former city and realized it was not as affected as other regions due to the war. So he takes his family back to repair his home. One night, robbers enter his home and take all of his money. Jonathan thinks that the robbery was a sign of God.
