No, as much as they wanted to stay neutral, they had no choice. They had to pick a side to be on
DRED SCOTT DECISION where the Supreme Court ruling stated slaves did not have a right to sue since they were not citizens, but merely property.
These were their arguments.
<span>Dred Scott:
When a person enters a free State or territory, the free status overrides the previous condition of servitude. Since slavery was forbidden in the free States and territories by
federal and State laws, Dred Scott became free when he entered Illinois and Wisconsin.</span><span>
Sandford:
To deprive a person of property (in this case, Dred Scott) without due process or just compensation violated the 5th Amendment, which states that “No person shall be… deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Dred Scott was still a slave and no master's property rights could be limited or taken away by a State or federal law.</span>
Answer:
Texas is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Im shore the ansswer is b b c
In The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx hypothesized that capitalism would fail if workers revolted and took over the economic system. They would then change this to socialism, and then it would become communism. This was due to excessive tensions between socio-economic classes and with the working class ultimately taking over, as Marx did not believe capitalism would be able to work within the bounds of society.
