Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
It started in 1954 and ended n 1974
Answer:
D. Children could attend school part of the day and work part of the day.
Explanation:
Children often worked full time jobs rather than attended school, and those that did likely would drop out later to work anyways.
Answer:
The article shows how Europe was influential in concepts related to the industrial revolution, since this revolution started there.
Explanation:
Europe was the cradle of the industrial revolution, which is why aritgo has the ability to shape and understand the industrial revolution. through the article, it is possible to see how the industrial revolution changed the traditional economy, reflected in agricultural production, generated solutions and social problems and how it spread throughout the world.
