Eat is the word that i choose lol
According to the options represented above, I would say that there is only one possible answer. As far as I know when you are preparing your outline, which of the following guidelines apply <span>D. The most important items in the outline should be located in higher levels of generalization. This one best fits the task and the rest of options just make no sense.</span>
Hello there! :D Personification is giving non-living things the abilities like humans. For example the sun eat ice cream. Sun can't eat ice cream lol XD so it is considered personification. Also another example is the rain made costumes for a party! Rain can't make costumes lol XD but it would be pretty cool if rain made costumes! ;)
Hope I helped! :D ;) Have a nice day! :3
Answer:
do you means what are the words that make peom nice
I believe the 'sentence' meaning in this context is the 'phrase' one, yes? As Winston Churchil was well known for his notorius quotes, and one in particular he stated to satirize a writing myth in English, usually understood as a rule, when criticized about doing it. Which I believe is the one the question is refering to.
The writing 'rule' (myth) Churchill's reply satirizes is the 'Never end a sentence on a preposition' rule (i.g. as I intetionally did on the immediate sentence before this one). And his reply to it was something like 'This is the type of errant pedantry up with which I will not put.'
The 'rule' is a myth, yes, but of course what Churchill did was an exaggeration to sneeringly point out the ignorance of those who criticized him.
His sentence therefore was incorrect. One possible change to improve it could be: 'This is the type of errant pedantry which I will not put up with.'
Specially the 'up' and 'with' of 'put up with' could never go in the middle of a sentence, as 'put up with' is a phrasal verb, meaning the verb and the preposition must always be together in the correct order.
I was able to find some possible variations of what his sentence could have actually had been, but in none of them the 'up with' goes along with 'put', so either ways we can assume that his sentence was deliberately wrong.