The cost of goods sold for the Askew Company for the year ending June 30, 2021 is $233,000.
Using this formula
Cost of goods sold=Beginning Inventory+ Net purchases- Ending Inventory
Where:
Beginning Inventory=$32,000
Net purchases=($240,000-$6,000-$10,000+$17,000)=$241,000
Ending Inventory=$40,000
Let plug in the formula
Cost of goods sold=$32,000+$241,000-$40,000
Cost of goods sold=$233,000
Inconclusion the cost of goods sold for the Askew Company for the year ending June 30, 2021 is $233,000.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/15708509
Answer: D. Both A and B are correct.
Explanation: Amortization is the reduction or paying off debt over time in a series of payments of interest and principal sufficient to repay the loan in full by its maturity date. As an accounting technique, it is used to periodically lower the book value of a loan or intangible asset over a period of time. Amortization related to overvalued equipment increases consolidated net income and under the equity method (a method used in the valuation of a firm's investment in another when it holds significant influence over the firm being invested in), it increases the parent's reported net income.
Answer:
a. less ice cream, less coffee
Explanation:
The percentage change in CPI is given by:
The percentage change in the prices of coffee and ice cream, respectively, are:
Both coffee and ice cream had an increase in price above the CPI increase, which means that both goods are being sold above the equilibrium price and thus their demand is likely to fall.
People likely will buy less ice cream, less coffee
The percentage of 250000 to 180000 is 72% or answer D
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
