Answer: The correct answer is "D. Caleb is personally jointly and severally liable along with Anna.".
Explanation: Caleb is personally jointly and severally liable along with Anna. When there is joint and several liability, a person has the right to claim payment of a debt or compensation for damage to any of those responsible or even all of them, without anyone being able to excuse themselves to evade their responsibility.
The family should be less likely to eat out on Tuesday as compared to the general population.
Given that,
- Out of 200 people, 15 people should eat out on Tuesday.
- Now only look 60 families out of this 10 should be preferred to eat out on Tuesday.
Based on the given information, we can conclude that the family should be less likely to eat out on Tuesday as compared to the general population.
Learn more about the population here: brainly.com/question/8696744
Answer:
b. applying cash receipts to a different customer's account in an attempt to conceal previous thefts of cash receipts is the correct answer.
Explanation:
- Lapping is best described as the process of applying cash receipts to a different customer's account in an attempt to conceal previous thefts of cash receipts.
- Lapping is an illegal mode of allotting one consumer's cash to another consumer's account.
- Lapping usually occurs in smaller businesses where a single person manages payment receipts and consumer billing.
- Companies can stop and check lapping through conducting regular inspections of payment receipts and also by dividing cashier and billing tasks.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": lawn fertilizer manufacturer.
Explanation:
Process costing is a type of costing approach used by companies to identify expenses for individual units produced. This method is useful for manufacturers in charge of mass production where all the units are almost the same or equal. Thus, <em>a lawn manufacturer could use the process costing system</em> because the equipment produced in that industry are almost equal and tend to be manufactured in large quantities.
Real estate experts should not provide advice
on tax implications. this is because to offer such an advice the expert need training and knowlidge on state and federal tax laws. Tax laws are complex and varies from state to state which requires a considerable high level training. ina ddition, the laws keep on changing as new budgets are read,and the expert may not be conversant with any change.
