1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PtichkaEL [24]
3 years ago
14

20 POINTS PLEAE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mathematics
2 answers:
Alina [70]3 years ago
5 0
His first payment is $100, thus a₁ = 100.

the next "term", month will be 1.1 times more than the one before, namely r = 1.1, the common ratio.

\bf \qquad \qquad \textit{sum of a finite geometric sequence}
\\\\
S_n=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\ a_1\cdot r^{i-1}\implies S_n=a_1\left( \cfrac{1-r^n}{1-r} \right)\quad 
\begin{cases}
n=n^{th}\ term\\
a_1=\textit{first term's value}\\
r=\textit{common ratio}\\
----------\\
a_1=100\\
r=1.1\\
n=20
\end{cases}

\bf \sum\limits_{i=1}^{20}~100(1.1)^{i-1}\qquad \qquad\qquad  \qquad S_{20}=100\left( \cfrac{1-1.1^{20}}{1-1.1} \right)
\\\\\\
S_{20}=100\left( \cfrac{1-\stackrel{\approx}{6.727499949}}{-0.1} \right)\implies S_{20}\approx 100(57.27499949)
\\\\\\
S_{20}\approx 5727.4999493256

is the serie divergent or convergent?

well, to make it short, when the common ratio is 0 < | r | < 1, namely a fraction between 0 and 1, only then the serie is convergent, namely it reaches a fixed value, now in this case, 1.1 is a value larger than anything between 0 and 1, so no dice.
frozen [14]3 years ago
5 0
The easiest way to get the answer is to use a spreadsheet. That will allow you to look at ways of getting the answer if you are not certain.

Step One
This is an exponential function and as such you have to make a built in correction factor. To get tn you need to use
tn = 100* [(1.1)^(1/20) ] ^ (20*(n - 1) )
1.1^(1/20) = 1.004776882
tn = 100 * (1.004776882)^(20*(n - 1) )  So if you want the 18th term, you do it like this.
t18 = 100*(1.004776882)^(20*(18 - 1)) 
t18 = 100*(1.004776882)^ 340
t18 = 100 * 5.0545
t18 = 505.45  Does that agree with what the spreadsheet gives? Amazingly enough it does!

Now we have to figure out how to get the sum of all those terms. 
Oddly, you go back to 1.1

\frac{100*(1 - (1.1)^{20})}{1 - 1.1} The answer can be made closer by using the adjustment we used for each term, but as you can see, the sum is within pennies of agreement.

I don't know how to represent this using sigma notation. I could if I knew the latex for it.

It is definitely a divergent series.

You might be interested in
Find the next two terms of the following sequence: 14,38,74,122,182,254
Roman55 [17]

ANSWER

The next two terms are

338, 434

EXPLANATION

The given sequence is 14,38,74,122,182,254

Let us observe some pattern and use it to find the next two terms.

14+24=38

38+36=74

74+48=122

122+60=182

182+72=254

To get the next term we add 84 to 254

254+84=338

To get the next term,we add 96 to 338

338+96=434

8 0
3 years ago
Please help! 10 points
Orlov [11]
<h2>Greetings!</h2>

Answer:

Angle A is 118°

Step-by-step explanation:

All angles in a circle add up to 180, so this means that all the measurements of the three angles add to 180:

x + 2x + 13 + x - 8 = 180

Clean it up:

3x + x + x + 13 -8

5x -5 = 180

To isolate the 5x, you need to move the +5 over to the other side, making it a negative 5:

5x = 180 - 5

5x = 175

Now divide each side by 5 to get the value of 1x:

\frac{5x}{5}  = \frac{175}{5}

x = 35

So angle A is:

3x + 13

3(35) + 13 = 118

<h3>So angle A is 118°</h3>
<h2>Hope this helps!</h2>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Among cases of heart pacemaker malfunctions, were found to be caused by firmware, which is software programmed into the device.
alex41 [277]

Complete question is;

Among 8834 cases of heart pacemaker malfunctions, 504 were found to be caused by firmware, which is software programmed into the device. If the firmware is tested in three different pacemakers randomly selected from this batch of 8834 and the entire batch is accepted if there are no failures, what is the probability that the firmware in the entire batch will be accepted? Is this procedure likely to result in the entire batch being accepted?

Answer:

P(All three are not caused by firmware) = 83.84%

Probability that the entire batch will be accepted = 0.8384

Step-by-step explanation:

We are told that out of the 8834 cases of heart pacemaker malfunctions, 504 were found to be caused by firmware.

Thus,

Cases not caused by firmware = 8834 - 504 = 8330

So, probability of the first case not being affected by firmware is;

P(first case not caused by firmware) = 8330/8834

Also,

Probability of second case not being affected by firmware is given as;

P(second case not caused by firmware|first case not affected by firmware) = 8329/8833

Similarly,

Probability of third case not being affected by firmware is given as;

P(third case not caused by firmware|first and second not caused by firmware) = 8328/8832

Now, looking at the 3 Probabilities gotten, it is obvious that the events are not independent because the probability of occurence of one event depends on the probability of occurence of the other event.

Thus, we will make use of the general multiplication rule which is;

P(A & B) = P(B) × P(A|B)

Thus;

P(All three not caused by firmware) = P(first case not caused by firmware) × P(second case not caused by firmware|first case not affected by firmware) × P(third case not caused by firmware|first and second not caused by firmware)

Plugging in the relevant values, we have;

P(All three not caused by firmware) = (8330/8834) × (8329/8833) × (8328/8832)

P(All three are not caused by firmware) = 0.83840506679 ≈ 83.84%

6 0
3 years ago
A 8-foot tall man is standing beside a 32-foot flagpole. The flagpole is
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

The flagpole's shadow is 16.875 feet longer than the man's shadow

Step-by-step explanation:

The total length of the shadow is expressed by taking its actual length by a factor that depends on the position of the sun which is constant for the man too. The expression is as follows;

Height of the shadow=actual height of the flagpole×factor

where;

length of the flagpole's shadow=22.5 feet

actual height of the flagpole=32 feet

factor=f

replacing;

22.5=32×f

32 f=22.5

f=22.5/32

f=0.703125

Using this factor in the expression below;

Length of man's shadow=actual height of man×factor

where;

length of man's shadow=m

actual height of man=8 feet

factor=0.703125

replacing;

length of man's shadow=8×0.703125=5.625 feet

Determine how much longer the flagpole's shadow is as follows;

flagpoles shadow-man's shadow=22.5-5.625=16.875 feet

The flagpole's shadow is 16.875 feet longer than the man's shadow

7 0
3 years ago
Solve each inequality. Justify each step (y-) - 4 + 2y &gt; 11
Anna11 [10]
It would stop at 3y+4>11 because the 3y and 4 are unlike terms and can only be divided or multiplied.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the surface area of the figure shown? (use 3.14 for pi)
    6·1 answer
  • Please help will mark brainliest (answer must be right)
    6·1 answer
  • Determine which expressions are polynomials. Explain your reasoning.
    9·1 answer
  • Pedro Pascal wants to have $15,000 in an account after five years. He found a bank that will offer him a 7.5% interest rate, com
    9·1 answer
  • Simplify
    5·2 answers
  • The length of life (in days) of an alkaline battery has an exponential distribution with an average life of 340 days. (Round you
    8·1 answer
  • What is 1/5 times 24 as a estimate?
    10·2 answers
  • A person walks 2 1/2 miles in 1 1/4 hours. How long does it take them to run 1 mile?
    10·1 answer
  • Y=x^2 -10x+25 number of solutions
    12·1 answer
  • What is the inequality for x -3 &lt; 5 (10 points for this question)
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!