1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
arlik [135]
3 years ago
12

What service is not provided by fashion services?

History
1 answer:
raketka [301]3 years ago
6 0
Accenture brings efficient global operating models, processes that manage scale and complexity, and strategies to drive growth in the fashion industry. ... Our experience and insights have revealed that technology is a critical facilitator of success in fashion and luxury.
You might be interested in
Explain Money supply in your own words‼️‼️
xxTIMURxx [149]

Money supply is the stock of the money circulating the economy. it involves all currency, including bills, deposit accounts, and liquid assets

7 0
3 years ago
Please help!
tankabanditka [31]

My answer to this question is below, I hope you are satisfied with it. :)

DATE ANSWERED: 5/6/2021

It is undeniable that humans have changed the environment around them as they progressed through technological advancements, and have even changed Earth itself. As humans have made advancements in transportation, construction, energy and power, communication, manufacturing, etc, humanity has had to find more ways of obtaining Earth’s natural resources, such as fossil fuels to power their expedition into the unknown. Numerous actions that humans have taken such as fossil fuels, pollution, deforestation, and many more have all negatively affected Earth.

One of the most harmful activities that humans have participated in is pollution. Whether it be air pollution, water pollution, or land pollution, humans have harmed the earth by polluting the environments around them. By destroying the environments around them, humans have harmed and killed the animals and plants that live on Earth with them, and have even harmed themselves as a result of pollution. Through economic and technological developments throughout history, humans have created air pollution such as smog, acid precipitation, and ozone depletion. The same can be said for water and land pollution, with factors such as oil spills, beach pollution, and littering being the main causes of those types of pollution. The pollution caused by humans have not only destroyed environments and habitats but have killed numerous humans as well, as reported in document 4: “Annu Nagar is one of 22 communities [in India] where the groundwater has been known for nearly 20 years to contain toxic levels of chlorinated solvents. Six years ago, responding to relentless efforts from activists, the Indian Supreme Court ordered the city to install pipes that bring in clean water from the Narmada River. But the pipes coming into some houses run right through sewers, and on rainy days, filth and feces mingle with the clean water. In the meantime, each monsoon may be carrying this toxic plume farther. The most recent survey suggests there are 20 more communities where the water is contaminated. In March of this year, the Supreme Court ordered that the city ensure clean water to these areas, too—and that it undertake a project to lay down sewage and drainage networks for the entire city.” This document gives an example of how water pollution has caused humans living in Annu Nagar to drink polluted water.  

Humans must strive to make advancements towards cleaner energy because the current situation on Earth is slowly killing the planet and its inhabitants. As humans have made advancements in transportation, construction, energy and power, communication, manufacturing, etc, humanity has had to find more ways of obtaining Earth’s natural resources, such as fossil fuels to power their expedition into the unknown. Whether it be air pollution, water pollution, or land pollution, we are killing plants, animals, and humans that live on Earth.

5 0
3 years ago
The Ottoman Empire likely entered into the conflict referred to in the passage because?
WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

it had lost significant territory to other European states in the nineteenth century.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The nation that became the britain of the orient late in the 19th century was
irinina [24]
The answer is Japan / Vietnam 
4 0
3 years ago
It could be said that “History is what the present chooses to remember about
Masja [62]

Since we don't know which movie is being referred to, let's talk generally about the relationship between history and cinema.

The present influences every historical production. There is an influence of the present on historiographical works -- that is, history produced by and for historians, academics -- as there is on movies, fiction books, tv series, etc.

However, historians are aware of this since the first moment of their studies, so they are trained to seek detachment from the present in order to avoid a biased view of the past. But the present is always a strong force and neutrality is impossible. Thus the most plausible way to follow on historical research is to make clear how the present shows in the work, how it guided questions, and turn it into a tool to understand the past.

When we talk about a movie this is different. A historical movie is a different kind of medium -- it's not a paper published after other historians' approval -- and has a different kind of audience than historical research. So it doesn't have the same space to make it explicitly clear how the present influences it; it can not put a footnote when it's portraying historical events and figures so the viewer can check things on his/her own. When we watch a movie we don't have access to sources utilized and on which historiographical line the movie production based its story.

Following from this, basically, you have three possible conclusions:

1) Movies don't improve the viewer's understanding because it is difficult to check if the movie production utilized reliable sources and bibliography. It could portray historical events with absurd analysis, make whopping anachronisms, which doesn't lead to a qualified understanding of history.

2) Movies improve the viewer's understanding of history because, despite analytical errors and anachronisms, it contributes to spread knowledge about the past that can be later improved through qualified studying by the viewer. It can be said movies have an important role in disseminating a historical culture that can be healthy for societies.

3) Movies can improve as much as they can damage serious historical knowledge and the understanding of history. If they are based on qualified historiography they can be important diffusers of a healthy historical culture that helps society to think and rethink its past, present, and future. However, if they spread poor historical knowledge, they can make it hard for good quality history to gain headway.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Which period represents the last 2 million years of geologic time?
    14·2 answers
  • The Canadian Shield contains many mineral deposits.<br><br> True<br><br> False
    7·2 answers
  • Who made Christianity the official religion of Rome?
    8·1 answer
  • What did the terms of the missouri compromise impose on the lands of the louisiana purchase
    9·2 answers
  • Who has the power to begin the process of raising taxes in the united states? (1 point) courts house of representatives presiden
    6·1 answer
  • Identify ONE economic benefit that colonial territories derived from imperialism.
    13·1 answer
  • 1. Which statement best summarizes Britain’s argument for taxes like the Stamp Act?
    8·2 answers
  • How does the president become isolated?
    11·1 answer
  • Which group of vikings settled Russia in the 16th Century? please help out i need it
    14·1 answer
  • The article talks mainly about __________.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!