Answer:
I agree with this.
Explanation:
This book is really suitable for its time. We have several issues to highlight that support this phrase. For example, science was beginning to develop a little more here as a solution to everyday problems. Another thing is the morale for example that Lanyon handled. At that time a doctor was someone who managed within the moral, so it was a monstrosity what his friend did.
We also have the fact of the differences established by money. Dr Jekyll was a wealthy person who would never be questioned for his actions, just for having money and being someone truly respected.
Offering a counterclaim and giving enough evidence to disprove that counterclaim strengthens the argument by reassuring the reader/audience that the you are well-informed and able to discern multiple perspectives. It’s like when you’re trying to convince your parents to let you go out with your friends at night or on a school night, you should state why you want to go and you should also acknowledge what they’re trying to say otherwise they’ll think that you’re not aware of the dangers out there.
The answer is D, my guy. Mark me as brainlest, leave a rate, and thanks! All positive vibes. :)
