Because people could relate to johnson. Johnson was on their side
In the North, they were mostly industrial textiles, lumber, furs, fish, and maize
In the South, there are mostly tobacco plantations, later on cotton plantations
Answer:
In the context of the history of slavery in the Americas, free people of color (French: gens de couleur libres; Spanish: gente de color libre) were people of mixed African, European, and sometimes Native American descent who were not enslaved. The term arose in the French colonies, including La Louisiane and settlements on Caribbean islands, such as Saint-Domingue (Haiti), St.Lucia, Dominica, Guadeloupe, and Martinique, where a distinct group of free people of color developed. Freed African slaves were included in the term affranchis, but historically they were considered as distinct from the free people of color. In these territories and major cities, particularly New Orleans, and those cities held by the Spanish, a substantial third class of primarily mixed-race, free people developed. These colonial societies classified mixed-race people in a variety of ways, generally related to visible features and to the proportion of African ancestry.[citation needed] Racial classifications were numerous in Latin America.
Explanation:
A. Increased spending on the military. Republicans support tax breaks for the rich, want small government, and think minimum wage is ridiculous. (Not my personal views)
Answer:
the combination in one company of two or more stages of production normally operated by separate companies.
Explanation:
