Answer:
The answer is George B. McClellan.
Explanation:
Answer:
1. The Boston Massacre was a deadly riot that occurred on March 5, 1770, on King Street in Boston. It began as a street brawl between American colonists and a lone British soldier, but quickly escalated to a chaotic, bloody slaughter. The conflict energized anti-British sentiment and paved the way for the American .
2. Tensions began to grow, and in Boston in February 1770 a patriot mob attacked a British loyalist, who fired a gun at them, killing a boy. In the ensuing days brawls between colonists and British soldiers eventually culminated in the Boston Massacre.
3.The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a "patriot" mob, throwing snowballs, stones, and sticks, and a squad of British soldiers. Several colonists were killed and this led to a campaign by speech-writers to rouse the ire of the citizenry.
4. Skirmishes between colonists and soldiers—and between patriot colonists and colonists loyal to Britain (loyalists)—were increasingly common. His gunfire struck and killed an 11-year-old boy named Christopher Seider and further enraged the patriots.
5.John Adams agreed to defend the eight British soldiers in court, risking his political status, due to his belief in fairness of law and justice, the basic structure of laws in the United States. In the end of his battle for integrity of the law, his sacrifices were rewarded when he won the case.
Hope this helps :)
The early humans that arrived in the Americas were thought to have eradicated large ice age animals. However, research later revealed that the disappearance of such animals may have been caused by climate change. According to earliest dated artefacts, this may have happened more than 15000 years ago
Answer:
The Royal Proclamation of 1763.
Explanation:
After Britain won the Seven Years' War and gained land in North America, it issued the Royal Proclamation of 1763, which prohibited American colonists from settling west of Appalachia.
Answer:
Globalization has the potential to help both developing and developed countries. However, affluent countries' development rates are substantially faster than developing countries' due to advantages such as technology, education, money, and management.