Answer:
The absence of armed fight against the mother country (Spain and Portugal), and the result of each independence.
Explanation:
The main characteristic of the independence movements of the Spanish colonies is that in almost all there was a war between the colonists and colonizers that dragged on for some years and ended with the victory of the colonists. It was like that in Chile, Uruguay, Argentina, and Bolivia. In Brazil, <u><em>there were several conflicts during the Independence process, but none directly influenced the Declaration of Independence.</em></u>
The main difference between the Independence movements of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile is the result achieved by each country. In Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, declarations of Independence took these countries directly to the republican regime, while <u><em>in Brazil there was only a political break with the metropolis maintaining the entire system that was in force during the colony.</em></u>
Answer:
i thinks is A
Explanation:
fossil can help u identify how big they were and if it was a type of species and how long ago were
Answer:
True
Explanation:
CALEA stands for Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act of 1994.CALEA was passed for allowing the law enforcement agencies to conduct surveillance of digital telephone networks, as per the law the telephone companies are obliged to help them tap the phone conversations of people over the companies phone networks. The agencies can also record the conversation. CALEA also stands for Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies.
Correct answer: C. The congress system if set up became a model for the United Nations.
Explanation:
My authority source for choosing answer C is the United Nations itself. <em>UN Chronicle, </em>the magazine of the United Nations, featured an article titled, "From the Congress of Vienna to Present-Day International Organizations" (December, 2014). That article asserts points such as these:
- <em>When did the process of international organization start?1 It was not in 1945 nor in 1919. Rather, it was the Congress of Vienna (1814-15) that proved to be the relevant turning point in history, when certain conditions allowed a number of European States to set in motion a series of innovations, inventions and learning processes that shaped the core of what we today refer to as international organizations (IOs).</em>
- <em>The major innovation at Vienna was the follow-up conference. This new idea resulted in the custom of participating States to convene, upon reaching an agreement, a follow-up conference to assess whether previously agreed-upon decisions and policies had been executed. ... Consequently, since 1815, that innovative idea resulted in an ongoing cycle of conferences dealing with similar and related issues. Apart from continuity, the cycle produced incremental decision-making and path dependency with regard to selected common solutions and efforts.</em>