Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Answer:
D. illegal drug trafficking
Explanation:
Answer: Natural resources are not equally dispersed over the globe. Other areas are endowed more than others, for example, some districts have plenty of water, (and also have access to oceans and seas). Others have lots of minerals and forest lands. Some have, wildlife, fossil fuels, metallic rocks. "Oil was formed when remains of living things that existed a long time ago were buried under mud in the bottom of the sea. The mud became rocks and put pressure on the remains. The remains were also heated up by surrounding rocks. Heat and pressure changed the remains to oil. Sometimes, movement in the Earth’s surface cause these underwater areas to rise. Oil becomes easier to drill when it is not underwater." 'Natural resources, like copper and iron that is used in computers, can be found in different places in the world. Chile has much more copper in its land than the United States. Iron ores are more abundant in Australia and Brazil than in the United States. Additionally, graphite is more plentiful in China, Mexico, Brazil, and Canada than in the United States.'
Explanation:
I got a 100%
Many items are made out of silk such as shirts, dresses, ties blouses, robes, gun powder bags, and pajamas.
*Hope I Helped*
Answer:
The Great Schism came about due to a complex mix of religious disagreements and political conflicts. One of the many religious disagreements between the western and eastern branches of the church had to do with whether or not it was acceptable to use unleavened bread for the sacrament of communion.
