The answer is D. Partnerships are liable to boundless obligation, which implies that each of the partners shares the risk and budgetary dangers of the business. Which can be off-putting for a few people. This can be countered by the arrangement of a restricted obligation organization, which profits by the upsides of constrained risk allowed to restricted organizations, while as yet exploiting the adaptability of the association show.
Answer:
the lump sum that would equal the present value of the annual installments is $38,163,612
Explanation:
The computation of the lumspum amount is as follows;
= Cash flow × (1 - (1 + rate of interest)^-number of years) ÷ rate of interest)
= $89 million × (1 - (1 + 0.0765)^-26) ÷ 0.0765)
= $38,163,612
Hence, the lump sum that would equal the present value of the annual installments is $38,163,612
Therefore the above is calculated by applying the given formula
Answer:
The largest revenue the supplier can make under this deal is $24,151.2
Explanation:
Working file has been attached to help understand how the answer was derived. Some points to note in the sheet are:
- The sheet represents the following columns which are S. No., Chairs, Price, Total Revenue and difference in each revenue.
- As the no. of chairs rises the price is dropping by $0.2 in the entire order.
- However, at first this increase in order of chairs is beneficial even with the drop in the price of entire order.
- At the point, where chairs ordered are 348 and price is $69.4 the revenue is at its largest which is $24,151.2.
- After this point the increase in the no. of chairs is only decreasing the overall total revenue of the supplier.
Answer:
The equipment originally cost 40,000 and has a salvage value of 8,000, which means that the amount that can be depreciated is 32,000. It has a life of 8 years and follows a straight line method so the yearly depreciation would be 32,000/8= 4,000.
The depreciation for the first 2 years is 4000*2= 8,000
So the book value of the asset is 40,000-8000= 32,000
Since according to the new estimate the total life is 5 years, and 2 years have already passed the remaining life of the asset is 3 years. Also since there is no change in salvage value the amount that can be depreciated is 32,000-8,000= 24,000
To find out the deprecation in year 3 we will divide 24,000 by the reaming life which is 3.
24,000/3= 8,000
The depreciation expense in year 3 would have been $8,000
Explanation:
The first marketing law suggests that in order to be successful in the market, the marketers need to understand the customer's demand and identify the brand positioning of the product in the market. Therefore, the option C holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of marketing laws?</h3>
Marketing laws are the ones that are universally accepted principles followed by marketers in order to get successful position in the market. The first and foremost law tells about how one should position the brand in a market over the demand of customers.
Therefore, the option C holds true and states regarding the significance of marketing laws.
Learn more about marketing laws here:
brainly.com/question/16264752
#SPJ4
The incomplete question has been completed below for better reference.
A. Understand customer's demands
B. Identify brand positioning
C. Both A and B
D. None of these
