1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sladkih [1.3K]
3 years ago
10

The Plessy v. Ferguson case upheld “separate but equal” as constitutional, which Question 1 options: improved social conditions

for African Americans strengthened segregation policies (Jim Crow) increased African American suffrage allowed for African Americans to use white facilities
History
2 answers:
Lisa [10]3 years ago
8 0
Answer is: <span>strengthened segregation policies (Jim Crow).
</span>Plessy v. Ferguson was Supreme Court decision of 1896, which allowed state-sponsored segregation. <span>This decision legitimized the state laws racial segregation. </span>Jim Crow laws<span> were state and local laws that allows </span>racial segregation<span> in the </span>Southern United States.
valentina_108 [34]3 years ago
4 0

The Plessy v. Ferguson case upheld “separate but equal” as constitutional, which strengthened segregation policies. This was the Supreme Court judgment of 1896, which authorized state-sponsored discrimination. This consequence legitimized the rules about segregation which was designated as Jim Crow Laws. This sanctions racial segregation in the southerly part of the United States.

Further Explanation

In 1896, Plessy v. Ferguson was a milestone judgment of the U.S. Supreme Court which supported the constitutionality of ethnic discrimination statutes for public facilities as long as the isolated facilities were similarly turned to be a doctrine which came to be recognized as "separate but equal".  

The conclusion legitimized various state laws re-establishing racial discrimination which had been legislated in the American South after the termination of the Reconstruction Era.

The judgment included a case that dawned in 1892 when Homer Plessy, an "octoroon" inhabitant of New Orleans, intentionally disrupted Louisiana's Separate Car Act of 1890, which claimed "equal but separate" passenger car agreements for white and non-white customers.  

Learn more:

1. During the French and Indian war, France and great Britain fought for control of north American territory. what impact did the end of the war have on the American colonies? <u>brainly.com/question/784979 </u>

2. Which is the best definition of a command economy? <u>brainly.com/question/599575</u>

3. James mcculloch most likely supported the idea that congress could create banks because he knew that Maryland law did not allow for state-run banks. he believed the court should follow the implied powers of the constitution. he supported the idea of federal supremacy. he didn’t want to pay state taxes on his bank? <u>brainly.com/question/2564199 </u>

Answer Details

Grade; High School

Subject; History

Topic; Plessy v. Ferguson

Keywords

Plessy v. Ferguson, Segration, Reconstruction Era, Orleans, louisians, supreme court, unconstitutional, New Orleans Plessy.

You might be interested in
The Nullification Crisis was caused by which political idea?
NeTakaya

<u>Answer:</u>

The Nullification Crisis was caused by the political idea of the states’ rights.

<u>Explanation: </u>

  • In the initial decades after the US declared independence, the issue of trade and tariffs kept on surfacing for a long time.
  • To get rid of the tariffs imposed by the union, the 'state of South Carolina' passed an ordinance to declare the tariffs of the union 'null and void' within the boundaries of the state.
  • This gave birth to growing 'tensions' between the 'union' and the 'state of South Carolina' over the issue of states' right to pass such an ordinance. The crisis came to be known as the 'Nullification Crisis'.
3 0
3 years ago
Define photosynthetic<br><br><br><br> . . . . yaar koi ha online​
DedPeter [7]

Explanation:

Photosynthesis is the process by which plants use sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide to create oxygen and energy in the form of sugar.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP IM TAKING AN ASSESSMENT
Andre45 [30]

Answer:

URL copied to clipboard

As the one hundredth anniversary of the beginning of World War I approaches, one may encounter some rather strained attempts to compare the current global balance of forces to that in Europe in 1914. I recently visited several countries in south east Asia and a different comparison struck me, the similarities between now and the 1930s, weak democracies and strong dictatorships.

This comparison “jumped off the page” after a week in Bangkok, followed by several days in Hanoi - a journey from a country with weak and faltering formal democratic institutions to an apparently stable one with an authoritarian regime (bordering on a country with a considerably more brutal dictatorship, China).

In The Age of Extremes, Eric Hobsbawm argued that the conflict between capitalism and communism determined the course of the twentieth century.  This confrontation of socio-economic ideologies without doubt dominated European and global history, especially after 1945.  But another, inter-related confrontation that determined the course of the century was authoritarianism versus democracy. The capitalism-communism conflict seems but a moment of history for people in their forties and younger. However, the danger of a rising authoritarian wave is as imminent in the twenty-first century as it was in the twentieth.

In most countries of Europe in the 1930s the contest between authoritarian and democratic visions of society dominated the political struggle. The exceptions were Italy where the fascists had already established an extreme version of authoritarian rule, and Britain where a rigid class structure gave stability to superficially democratic institutions. By the middle of the decade, capitalist authoritarian regimes were clearly on the rise in Germany and much of central and eastern Europe (e.g., Hungary and Poland), as well as Portugal, with Spain soon to join the anti-democratic camp.

Indeed, in very few of the industrialised countries in the late 1930s did democracy seem the stronger trend. Among the large countries only in the United States was there an unambiguous shift towards strengthening popular participation. Ironically enough it was during the presidency of patrician Franklin D Roosevelt that trade unions asserted themselves as a major political force (which would not survive much past mid-century).

Now, well into the twenty-first century it is even more difficult to find a major country with vigorous and democratic institutions, certainly not in the United States nor in Europe. In the United States the confrontation between a well-funded right wing Republican Party and the middle-of-the road Democrat Party dominates politics, one doctrinaire and aggressive, the other muddled and vascillating. The anti-democratic trend is demonstrated by passage of laws restricting the right to vote in Republican controlled states, linked to the racist xenophobia of the Tea Party. In the White House sits a Democrat apparently unconcerned by a massively intrusive national security complex.

In Europe anti-democratic trends are if anything stronger. Britain probably has the most extensive video surveillance network in Europe (see recent articles in the Guardian), as well as legal restrictions on the right of assembly, designed to reduce public protests (as we find in Spain). In addition, the Conservative-dominated coalition government’s brutal attack on poor households receiving social support in effect legalises civil rights violations. Surveillance, attacks on the poor and the government fanning fears of immigrants combine to make a potent anti-democratic package.

On the continent pre-existing authoritarian tendencies enjoyed a quantum leap under the EU-wide austerity regime fostered by the German government under the cover of the European Commission. The unelected governments in Greece (2011-12) and Italy (2011-13) represent the most obvious and shocking examples of the authoritarian trend.  Much more serious in the long term is the EU fiscal compact (officially named the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union).

This treaty, which came into effect at the beginning of 2013, severely limits the authority of national parliaments to set fiscal policy. The treaty and additional measures demanded by the German government remove fiscal policy from public control (with monetary policy in the hands of the European Central Bank and beyond national accountability). This process in which major decisions are taken away from the electorate fundamentally undermines public faith in the democratic process.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Who was the 21st president of the United States?
Sholpan [36]

Chester A. Arthur was the 21st president of the United States of America.

He served from 1881 to 1885. He became president after Garfield was assassinated.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
''The world shall know Pains Me: Pains or Pain???????????????
solmaris [256]

Answer: I'm pretty sure its pain

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which issue led to violence and anger during Queen Mary religion in England
    12·1 answer
  • Make the correct match. please hurry
    15·1 answer
  • Why did cotton and tobacco production require large plantations in order<br> to become profitable?
    7·2 answers
  • World war ii began on this day in 1939 when nazi germany invaded which country
    8·1 answer
  • Which amendment established a federal income tax?
    9·1 answer
  • How did humanism influence the works of renaissance artists and authors
    8·1 answer
  • Explain how Nicholas Winton was able to save 669 children during the Holocaust. Do you think Winton was a
    6·1 answer
  • A product of the Tagbanua in Palawan<br>a. Biday <br>b. buti<br>c. tingkop<br>d. wild pig figurine​
    6·2 answers
  • Lexington and Concord What does the British soldier say happened? ​
    13·1 answer
  • Why do federal mandates cause friction between the federal, local and state governments? Mandates are hard to implement since th
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!