The correct answer is B) to protect interests in Kuwait's oil fields
Answer:
Here are some thoughts on two possible topics for the discussion:
1. “Change is welcome only when the outcomes are positive.” Change is unavoidable. But as humans, we have different ways of reacting to it depending on its outcome. If we view the outcome as positive, we are happy with the change and easily accept it. But if we view the outcome as negative or upsetting, we try to resist or deny the change. These two ways of reacting to change can be seen in both individuals and society as a whole. For example, students at a middle school might resist a change in school hours if it means having to get up earlier. But if the change means students can sleep in and arrive at school later, they might happily accept the new hours.
When a change is unavoidable and brings a negative outcome, it helps to change our outlook. Often, we focus only on the negative outcome of a change and overlook any positives. It will be easier to accept a negative change if we consider its positives. When my family had to relocate to Chicago, I resisted because it meant I would lose all my friends. But if I had focused on how I would get to live in a new place and make new friends, maybe the change would have been easier.
2. “It can be very hard to change yourself.” Who doesn’t want to change for the better? But change doesn’t happen overnight. It takes a lot of determination and hard work to bring about a change. Often, we tend to underestimate the efforts it takes to bring about a change. When we don’t see a quick change, we lose hope and give up trying altogether.
My cousin went through something similar. He joined a gym to get stronger and healthier. But within a week, he wanted to quit. He found the workouts tough and expected to see big changes in a week. Thankfully, his trainer encouraged him to stick to his routine. And after a month, he felt much healthier and fitter. Now he loves to get out and exercise. If my cousin had given up when he wanted to, he would have never seen the change in his health that he desired. Only by sticking to our goals can we expect to achieve a desired change.
Explanation:
This is the sample answer so make sure that you change it up a little :)
Because it is situation right on the cusp of Africa and the Middle East, had resources, and possibly the greatest benefit of all which was the Suez Canal. This would be crucial as with British and French interests in Asia and Africa meant that it's trading vessels could travel through it instead of going around the Horn of Africa
<span>C. President John Adams signed a constitutional amendment that gave the power of judicial review to the Supreme Court.</span>
Emmitte Litt
1. Born in Chicago, he was the only son of a Mississippi native named Mamie Till, whose family migrated as part of the Great Migration to Chicago. He developed polio at age 6, which left him stuttering. He stayed outgoing amid the setback. He and his cousins and friends enjoyed playing baseball, riding bicycles and fishing. He was so fond of having fun that he would pay people to tell him jokes. He moved to Mississippi in August 1955 for a holiday with his nephew, Wheeler Parker. The boys were staying at the
2. Posthumously, Till became a symbol of the movement for civil rights. Till was born and raised in the Illinois town of Chicago. He visited relatives near Money, in the Mississippi Delta area, during the summer holidays in August 1955. He talked to twenty-one-year-old Carolyn Bryant, the married white owner of a small grocery store there.
3. On August 28, 1955, 14-year-old Emmett Till, an African American from Chicago, was brutally murdered while visiting his family in Money, Mississippi, for allegedly flirting with a white woman four days earlier.
4. A public open-casket funeral for her son insisted on Till's distraught mother to shed light on the abuse inflicted on blacks in the South. Till's killers were acquitted, but civil rights leaders nationally were galvanized by his murder.
5. 'A number of stakeholders' questioned the Department of Justice in 2004 if any remaining offenders could be tried. The department concluded after analyzing available records that, according to the report, the statute of limitations prohibited any criminal prosecution. A Mississippi grand jury refused to press fresh charges three years later.
I did this much because didn’t have have much time. Brainly would be appreciated!:)
