I think the answer would be D
hope this helps
Answer:
Rights are natural and are endowed by the very nature of our existence. It then follows that we cannot be separated from them, they are inalienable. Rights can be abused, restricted in their use or made ineffective but they cannot be removed. A person can be punished for saying something unpopular but short of killing him that person can still say whatever he wants. Since a right is inalienable, it cannot be separated from a person that person cannot transfer it either. What would be the point after all since everyone is equally endowed with the same natural rights.
If that is understood then everything else conferred on us by society then should be recognized as privilege. The first right that applies to your question is the right to equitable treatment. Even the poorest has equal claim on services that are available. The second right in play here is the right to aquire property and to be secure in its ownership. When any outside force whether it is your neighbor or the government attempts to tresspass on your ownership of the property it is theft and a violation of the owner's rights.
To claim the poorest person has a right to services, equitable treatment sustains that right. But to claim that a person who cannot pay for that service but is entitled to it at another's expense is theft.
<h3>
<u>PLEASE</u><u> MARK</u><u> ME</u><u> BRAINLIEST</u></h3>
In the story, it was the time of the Night or Rebirth when all creatures diet. The moon changes from young and beautiful(she was described as mesmerizing and luminescent) to old and weak(she became a sprinkle of sparkling dust, or the title "embers of moonlight" itself)
The trial of John Peter Zenger was important for the freedom of speech for American colonists. J.P.Zenger pointed out in some articles in the newspaper how the government had engaged in corruption . For these articles he was arrested and trialed. He was defended by the most famous lawyer of that time, Andrew Hamilton.
Question: The trial of Peter Zenger established what for the court system?
Answer: <u>D. that the jury has the power to decide if a law has been broken, along with the deciding facts of the case.
</u>
Answer:
Explanation:
there are no pictures so there is no way to figure it out.
