Carnegie created a monopoly and he did this by investing in new technology which helped him grow his steel corporation. He went to other factories took their ideas and incorporated them into his. He also bout other companies that would help his own companies. In growing his monopoly he used vertical integration, he combined all of his companies into one large one which he named Carnegie Steel. He had the raw materials, his own manufacturing sites and steel mills and a way to transport his product. This is vertical integration, get the materials, make the steel, and ship it.
It called Independence of Central America as the current Commemorations -for the countries of Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica- signing the Act of Independence of Central America on 15 September 1821. As captain was formed in, by The Provincia Of Guatemala, Chiapas, Comayagua, San Salvador and the province of Nicaragua and Costa Rica. The subscription of the document as. brough consecuences the independence from of the Spanish Government.
Volume impulse then Central American independence from the French occupancy in 1808 in Spain, which I create political chaos in the Iberian peninsula ending with the formation of different popular resistance groups. Making spanish gov clandestin and promulgated the 1812 Constitution which had it a direct impact on América. The first separatist Movement in Central gave it is on 5 November 1811, by a conspiracy by Jose Matias Delgado and Nicolás Aguilar tried a few weapons in San Salvador. To this movement follow riots following in Nicaragua, the plot of others Bethlehem Movements 1814 to 1821. A meeting between the colonial same Authorities, and a meeting of religious leaders and notables compuesta fear ilustrados Creole, term 15 September 1821 con the spanish domain in the ancient viceroyalty of Guatemala, who understand the current territory of the State of Chiapas (Mexico) and the republics of Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica.
Answer:
The act was designed to limit the power of monopolies and trusts.
The act did not lead to many successful government prosecutions.
The fact that the act did not define the terms “monopoly” and “trust” limit the act.
Support from the federal courts would have made the act more effective.
Explanation:
