Answer:
The answer to this question is Java,C++.
Explanation:
We can assign non static final variables a value with the declaration or in the constructor but this is not the case with c++ because we have to assign value during declaration and c++ equivalent of final is const keyword and there is sealed or readonly keywords in c# not final.If we do not assign value at the time of declaration the const variable will contain garbage value which cannot be changed afterwards.
The database planner would most likely create a table that contains customer contact information since these would be the individuals who placed an order for Sarah's products after visiting her blog.
Answer:
Expensive is not always better
Explanation:
So I build 2 computers ok
Computer 1: Price 1,999$
<u>Whats Included:</u>
- Antivirus
- Anti-Over-Heat
- Windows 8 Operating Software
- Free VPN (For Life)
- 24/7 Support
- 1 year warranty
- 3/5 Star Reviews | Main Review Type: Parts Breaking Inside
Computer 2: Price 799$
<u>Whats Included:</u>
- Anti Virus
- Anti Over-Heat
- 1 Year Warranty
- Windows 10 Operating Software
- 24/7 Support
- 10 Year Warranty
- 4/5 Star Reviews | Main Review Type: Runs Smooth
- No VPN
<h2>So Computer 2 Has better reviews and a 10 year warranty over computer 1's 1 year warranty</h2>
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
Answer:
? Read on to learn about the possible reasons and resolutions. ... Check whether you have the latest update installed for InDesign. ... InDesign cannot open the file when your system does not have enough memory ... Copy page elements into a new document.
Explanation:
