Answer:
Return on Assets (2006) = 7.60 %
Explanation:
Return on Assets = Earnings Before Interest and Tax ÷ Total Assets
Therefore,
Return on Assets (2006) = ($115,000 + $30,000) / ( $600,000 + $60,000 + $900,000) × 100
= $118,000 / $1,560,000 × 100
= 7.60 % (one decimal place)
Answer:
2.6%
Explanation:
Jensen Measure is calculated using the below formula
Jensen Alpha = Rp - (Rf + beta*(Rm - Rf))
Where Rp = Return on portfolio = 20%, Rf = risk free rate = 3%, Beta = Beta of portfolio = 1.8 and Rm = Market return = 11%
Jensen Alpha = 20 - (3 + 1.8*(11-3))
Jensen Alpha = 20 - (3 + 1.8*8)
Jensen Alpha = 20 - (3 + 14.4)
Jensen Alpha = 20 - 17.4
Jensen Alpha = 2.6%
Answer:
be greater than the net operating income under variable costing
Explanation:
Under absorption costing method it includes the total cost of the product that is the fixed cost and variable cost to account for the production.
Whereas in variable costing we only consider the variable cost of production and deduct the fixed costs from the contribution margin.
As George corporation has no beginning inventory and production exceeds sales therefore cost of goods sold reduces( due to closing inventory) resulting in greater net operating income than in variable costing .
The invalid score is 300 because the lower, the worse.
Okay so rewards and penalties make people make better decisions. So like if I don't get questions wrong on a test I receive $5 from my parents, but if I fail a test I'm grounded for a week. So I study more to get money. (this is not actually me just making an example). Rewards make people want to do better, and so do penalties. I don't want to do bad and get punished for it.
