This is the answer I got. Lemme know if it is correct or helpful! :)
Locke argued that people formed governments to protect their natural rights. If a government did not live up to that purpose, then people had the right to rebel and form a new government. This idea contrasted sharply with the idea of the divine right of kings to rule as absolute monarchs.
Answer -
<span>C. They were more dependent on imported manufactured goods so they bore the brunt of most of the tariffs.
</span>
Reason -
The
South relied heavily on agriculture, and had little industry, so they
got their manufactured goods from Europe. The tariffs forced them to pay
extremely high taxes on those goods. The North, however, was very
industrial, and they had most of these manufactured goods- they didn't
get them from overseas and therefore didn't have to pay tariffs on them.
Since the tariffs on Europe's goods were so high, the South had to rely
on the North, who could basically sell those goods to the South at any
ridiculous price they wanted to. It was not a fair deal.
The colonists called it the French and Indian War, and it permanently shifted the global balance of power. By the mid-18th century, both the British and French wanted to extend their North American colonies into the land west of the Appalachian Mountains, known then as the Ohio Territory.
Answer: option (C). It says federal laws are superior to state laws.
Explanation: The supremacy clause of the constitution tells us that the federal laws is above the state laws. The farmers of the constitution included the supremacy clause in the constitution because they believed that the central government needed to have more power than the state government.
Article VI, paragraph 2 of the United State constitution declares that the constitution, laws, and treaties of the central government is supreme law of the land to which judges in every state are bound irrespective of what the state laws says. The law establish the federal law and the federal constitution supersede the state laws and state constitution. The law strictly prohibits the states from interfering with the central government constitution and government exercise that are exclusively entrusted to the central power.