<span>King believed in interconnectedness across the US, he thought they should be willing to help each other because they are all a part of a bigger country. He also felt no one should feel as though they are an outsider when the live in the US, communities should be welcoming to all people. In order to achieve this, they would need to support each other and join up like a big family. I think this is a great concept because unity would make the country stronger and bring everyone together. America's purpose is to give people home for a great life, and we should be aiding each other in achieving that.</span>
The third statement is correct.
Nick, who was our dorm advisor, and Joe, Nick's roommate, raised their concerns to the school residence office. They wanted to know why Dennis didn't have to share a room.
In the first statement, there are two subjects- Nick and Joe. However, "his" is used in the predicate referring only to one of the two subjects. This made the sentence incorrect. The same with the second statement. It used not only "his" in the first sentence, but it also used "he" in the second sentence referring to only one of the two subjects mentioned, instead of "they".
Answer:
Through the diverse cases represented in this collection, we model the different functions that the civic imagination performs. For the moment, we define civic imagination as the capacity to imagine alternatives to current cultural, social, political, or economic conditions; one cannot change the world without imagining what a better world might look like.
Beyond that, the civic imagination requires and is realized through the ability to imagine the process of change, to see one’s self as a civic agent capable of making change, to feel solidarity with others whose perspectives and experiences are different than one’s own, to join a larger collective with shared interests, and to bring imaginative dimensions to real world spaces and places.
Research on the civic imagination explores the political consequences of cultural representations and the cultural roots of political participation. This definition consolidates ideas from various accounts of the public imagination, the political imagination, the radical imagination, the pragmatic imagination, creative insurgency or public fantasy.
In some cases, the civic imagination is grounded in beliefs about how the system actually works, but we have a more expansive understanding stressing the capacity to imagine alternatives, even if those alternatives tap the fantastic. Too often, focusing on contemporary problems makes it impossible to see beyond immediate constraints.
This tunnel vision perpetuates the status quo, and innovative voices —especially those from the margins — are shot down before they can be heard.
