Answer:
Plantation owners and southern industrialists wants slavery whereas Quakers and freed slaves wants to fight slavery.
Explanation:
Plantation owners and southern industrialists are the people who take advantage from the slave without giving money that support slavery in the mid-1700s while on the other hand, Quakers and freed slaves were some groups that present in northern states began to fight again slavery in the mid-1700s. The northern states wants to end slavery because the work force present in the northern states sees the slavery a threat for their job. They thought if the slavery continues the northern industries also used slaves in their place.
Answer:
The five world religions that have had profound impacts on culture and civilization are:
- Judaism: The location of origin of Judaism is ancient Israel.
- Christianity: Christianity originated from an area of Middle East that is presently known as Israel.
- Islam: Islam as a religion originated from Saudi Arabia, Mecca to be precised.
- Buddhism: Buddhism originated from India. It refers to the teaching of a man called Guattama Buddha. Guattama was initially a follower of Hindu faith.
- Hinduism: The origin of location of Hinduism is considered to be India and Nepal.
These five religions that are practiced in different part of the world had diffused from one corner of the world to another and have had great influence on the cultures and development of civilizations in different regions of the world.
Answer: Senator Stephen Douglas proposed the bill that became the Kansas-Nebraska Act as a way of getting southern support for Nebraska statehood. Douglas was seeking to bring Nebraska into the Union in order to bring those lands under government authority and lay the groundwork for building a Midwestern route of transcontinental railroad that would run to Chicago and benefit his state (Illinois). The compromise to gain support from the South was to create two states, Nebraska and Kansas, and allow voters in those areas to choose whether they'd be slave or free. The thought was that Kansas might end up as a slave state and Nebraska as a free state, thus maintaining the balance between free and slave states.
Further detail:
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was enacted by Congress in 1854. It granted popular sovereignty to the people in the Kansas and Nebraska territories, letting them decide whether they'd allow slavery. In essence, this made the Kansas-Nebraska act a repeal of the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had said there would be no slavery north of latitude 36°30´ except for Missouri.
After the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed into Kansas to try to sway the outcome of the issue, and violence between the two sides occurred. The term "bleeding Kansas" was used because of the bloodshed. Kansas and Nebraska ended up as free states, but the Kansas-Nebraska Act had allowed the possibility that slavery could become slave states.
Answer:
how so I help you with nothing to help you on
Answer:
Because the company promoted a biased description of virgins by establishing only the good points about it, while Smith and Frethorne's accounts were more realistic and impartial.
Explanation:
The company promoted a description where it only addressed the qualities of Vírginia. This was done to help settlers and show the state as a wonderful and flawless earth. In fact, Vírginia had advantages, but the description of the company was completely biased and incomplete in many factors. John Smith and Richard Frethorne, on the other hand, presented more complete reports, as they were indeed familiar with the territory. They presented a more impartial report, describing the state as it really was, without alleviating possible defects.
