"<span>The rejection of the Olive Branch Petition" would be the best option, since this was submitted to Britain before the Declaration in the hopes that the colonies would be able to prevent war but still have Britain address their grievances. </span>
that less fortunate individuals were weak and unfit to survive. it was a person's moral duty to help less fortunate people.
<u>Motion of an object with lot of inertia:</u>
All objects are immune to changes in orientation. This phenomenon is evident in all objects-inertia is present.
Inertia and mass are the major factors.
But are any objects more likely than others to avoid changes? Definitely yes!
There are various masses in the propensity of an object to avoid shifts in its movement. Weight is the quantity that depends only on an object's inertia. The more momentum an object possesses the more mass it has. A bigger body is more likely to stand up to changes in its movement.
Suppose on the physics demonstration bench, there seem to be two matching bricks. Nevertheless, one brick is made of concrete and the other brick is made of steel mould.
How can you say the brick had been the Styrofoam brick by raising the bricks? You should give the bricks the same push to change their movement. Brick with the least strength-and therefore brick with the least weight–is the brick that provides the easiest path.
The answer would be White Man's Burden. It is a term that refers to the idea that Western people had a duty to civilize so-called “inferior” or nonwhite cultures. It was used to justify the European imperialism during the late nineteenth century.
The way that the Enlightenment's theories of government viewed the role of government was that government was meant to serve the people, not the other way around.
