Answer:
790,000, i.e. $79 x 10,000= 790,000
. Yes, the manufacturer should change the design. 666,667 (when it goes from 1/10,000 to 1/15,000). It is 500,000 (when it goes from 1/10,000 but 1/20,000)
. No, the benevolent social planner would not agree with the manufacturer's decision.
Explanation:
In the estimates provided by the manufacturer, the total cost of the design is equivalent to $79 x 10,000= 790,000. There should be an alteration in the design to remove the necessary precautions. If the probability is different from the estimate provided by the manufacturer, the planner will disagree with the decision made by the manufacturer. For example, a change to 1/15000 will make the total cost to be approximately $666,667.
Answer:
Exclusive distribution
Explanation:
Exclusive distribution -
It is the type of distribution , which have some dealers fixed for a specific geographical area , is known as Exclusive distribution .
It is the most restrictive form of distribution , and is majorly adopted by huge companies , who need to deliver to many parts .
Hence , from the question , the manufacturing unit , Caterpillar , uses this distribution method .
Answer:
marginal benefit is positive for the fourth slice and negative for the fifth slice.
Explanation:
In the case when four pizza slices are eaten and you have offered for the fifth one for free so here you refuse as the marginal utility of the fifth unit is negative so the consumption with respect to the fifth units would reduced the total utility also the marginal benefit for the fourth slice is positive but it is inverse for the fifth one
<span>The correct answer is "the elicitation effect."
The Elicitation Effect refers to the process wherein a person gathers intellect or knowledge about a certain process t be able to cope up with it. Based on the given situation, Toni is using elicitation, because he is thinking of what to do during lunch break, yet he waited to see if what the other employees would do during lunch break then he would just follow what they will be doing.</span>
Answer:
a. Cash paid to suppliers of merchandise during the reporting period: $44.1 million
b. A summary entry that represents the net effect of merchandise purchases during the reporting period as below:
Dr Cost of goods sold 44,000,000
Dr Inventory 6,700,000
Cr Account Payable 6,600,00
Cr Cash 44,100,000
Explanation:
We have the total amount goods buying from the supplier in the period = Cost of good sold in the period + Difference in the inventory balance of the period = $44 million + $6.7 million = $50.7 million
Thus, the additional amount owed supplier in the period is $50.7 million.
Account Payable increased by 6.6 million, it means that only 44.1 million ( that is, 50.7 million - 6.6 million) is paid during the period.
Thus, the summary will represents: Increase in COGS 44 million ( given); Increase in Inventory 6.7 million (given); Increase in account payable 6.6 million ( given) and Decrease in Cash 44.1 million ( calculated above).
