Answer:
The answer is B) "lower the prices that customers pay."
Explanation:
Actually, to increase capacity during high demands, the company do not need to lower the prices that customers pay but rather in crease the prices. According to law of demand and supply, the higher the demand, the more the price. Also, the company may also open another new branch for more production, approve overtime work and wages for employers, create more shifts and even subcontract part of the production to another company to ensure faster process but with same quality.
Answer:
$23,709
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Amount of bond issued = $700,000
Duration = 5 years
Interest rate = 8%
Selling amount of bond = $728,700
Market rate of interest = 7%
Now,
Interest paid = Amount of bond issued × Interest rate
= $700,000 × 0.08
= $56,000
Interest expense = Amount of bond sold × Market Interest rate
= $728,700 × 0.07
= $51,009
unamortized premium = Selling amount of bond - Amount of bond issued
= $728,700 - $700,000
= $28,700
Amortized amount = Interest paid - Interest expense
= $56,000 - $50,009
= $4,991
Balance of the premiums on bonds payable account immediately following the first interest payment
= unamortized premium - Amortized amount
= $28,700 - $4,991
= $23,709
Answer:
Option b (Substitution.....services) is the appropriate choice.
Explanation:
- The above leads to calculating difficulties as well as the failure throughout the Index to identify better products and services contributing to less precise inflation outcomes.
- It does not take account of the replacement facilities, which arise when an increase throughout the price of one promising recommendation to a replacement including its good by another, which often increases the costs of one quality.
The other options are not related to the given scenario. So the above is the correct choice.
Answer:
$66,000
$304,000
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Total implicit cost is
= Job left cost + forgone the return on investment
= $60,000 + $100,000 × 6%
= $60,000 + $6,000
= $66,000
And, the total cost is
= explicit cost + implicit cost
= $50,000 + $180,000 + $8,000 + $66,000
= $304,000
We simply applied the above formulas so that the correct values could come
A disadvantage of a short-term contract as an alternative on the make-or-buy continuum is that: B. the supplying firm has little reason to perform transaction-specific investments.
A short-term contract can be defined as a fixed term contractual agreement between two or more parties that has a definite duration of not more than one year or 24 months.
Hence, a short-term contract is characterized by a specific and limited amount of time.
A make-or-buy continuum can be defined as an act of making a strategic choice between manufacturing (making) a product internally (in-house) or buying the product from an external supplier.
Basically, one of the disadvantages of using a short-term contract as an alternative to the make-or-buy continuum is that, the supplying firm has little or no reason to perform transaction-specific investments i.e a non-transferable investment that has a unique utility.
Read more; brainly.com/question/23439561?referrer=searchResults
