Answer:
There's a popular belief that Americans fought and won the entire revolution with nothing but guerrilla warfare. That's not true, and the myth largely stems from how the war began. The very first military engagement between British and American forces occurred on April 19 of 1775. American militia men had been covertly transporting weapons and colonial government leaders from town to town, hiding them from the British army. The British heard about these stockpiles in the Massachusetts towns of Lexington and Concord and went to seize them. The American volunteers of these town gathered together to oppose the British, resulting in a brief skirmish. As the British beat a hasty retreat back towards Boston, American militia units basically popped out of the bushes along the entire road, shot a few volleys, and disappeared. It wasn't enough to decimate the British, but the British weren't prepared for it, and it drove them back.
Explanation:
Imagine that you are in charge of leading a small army of volunteer soldiers against the largest and most powerful professional army in the world. Are you going to march straight into battle? Not if you expect it to be a very long one!
For centuries, small armies have relied on guerrilla warfare to help even the odds. This includes non-traditional wartime tactics like ambushing, sabotage, and raids rather than direct engagements. Guerrilla warfare is not meant to really defeat an opponent; instead, the idea is to make the war drag on and become so expensive that your adversary gives up. It's the different between fighting a professional boxer versus a swarm of mosquitoes - the mosquitoes won't kill you, but they just may drive you away.
Amongst the many armies to try out these tactics were the American colonists fighting for their independence. The American Revolution was a conflict between a group of volunteers and a massive professional army. Did they think they could defeat Britain, the heavyweight champion of European colonialism? Maybe not, but while Britain prepared to defend its title, it was the colonists who learned how to 'float like a butterfly and sting like a bee.'
Hello. You forgot to provide the following information:
Document A: Texas Declaration of Independence
Document B: Alamo Defenders’ Speech
Answer:
Document B supports document A.
Explanation:
Alamo Defenders’ Speech was designed to reinforce the need for support in the fight for Texas independence. The speech supports the need for a free and absolute texas and therefore the execution of an armed struggle and the defense of the territory of the Alamo is extremely important, as it would be crucial for the objectives of independence to be met. The evidence used in this document supports the evidence from the Texas Independence Declaration, as it shows the reasons that led to the desire for independence and the willingness to fight for it.
Select ALL the correct answers.
Which three conditions did the Progressive Movement work to improve?
a. shortages of unskilled laborers.
b. lack of representation for women in politics.
c. lack of opportunities for business owners.
d. corruption in all levels of government.
e. children working long hours in factories.
Answer(s):
c, d, & e. (I think, I don't know if I'm exactly correct...:)
---->
The Website I Used to Find The Answer(s):
- https://www.answers.com/search?q=Select%20ALL%20the%20correct%20answers.%20Which%20three%20conditions%20did%20the%20Progressive%20Movement%20work%20to%20improve%3F%20%20a.%20shortages%20of%20unskilled%20laborers.%20b.%20lack%20of%20representation%20for%20women%20in%20politics.%20c.%20lack%20of%20opportunities%20for%20business%20owners.%20d.%20corruption%20in%20all%20levels%20of%20government.%20e.%20children%20working%20long%20hours%20in%20factories.
Thank you and TOTALLY check out the website listed above!
I don't know what "all other" factors could mean - since we don't know what factors have already been mentioned - but I assume that the pay and work conditions would be the same (those could be the "all other" here and the difference is Italy vs Germany/Belgium).
Generally, Italy is not a very likely destination for migrant workers, since it has recently been struggling economically. The payment, working conditions and work stability are likely to be better in Germany or Belgium, so if one can find a job, there, one is more likely to go to Germany or Belgium
